User talk:AndrewBrea1866

Into The Arms of Danger (2020 Film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Into The Arms of Danger (2020 Film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 13:47, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Into The Arms of Danger (2020 Film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Into The Arms of Danger (2020 Film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Into The Arms of Danger (2020 Film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello AndrewBrea1866. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AndrewBrea1866. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 22:53, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into The Arms of Danger (2020 Film). Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 23:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello (talk), please accept my apologies for editing your talk page comments - I thought the edited table was for group editing and did not realize that was part of your personal talk until after editing - totally my fault, sorry. In regards to your message above - I am not directly or indirectly connected to the mentioned article, nor am I receiving any compensation for my edits - I found the topic under RAs. Thank you!
 * So you decided to select a random article about a non-notable film, sourced to questionable sources and upload an image of their poster as your own work? Praxidicae (talk) 23:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Please take my word as stated AndrewBrea1866 (talk) 23:20, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * your word is irrelevant when it comes to copyright. How is this your own work? Please explain. Praxidicae (talk) 23:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

This has been rectified and re-uploaded correctly. Thank you for pointing that out. AndrewBrea1866 (talk) 23:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Poster ITAOD.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Poster ITAOD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)