User talk:AndrewC202

Speedy deletion of USN Habbo
A tag has been placed on USN Habbo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ViperSnake151 03:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

USN Habbo
Hello, please state why you think the article should not be deleted at Talk:USN Habbo, please. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 04:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you read WP:FICT? How is it notable? JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 04:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Q T C 04:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I don't understand. How is it "notable by the public?" Please add reliable sources to confirm the article's notability. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 04:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Q T C 04:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Q T C 04:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)