User talk:AndrewPeterT/2013 to June 2024 archive

Welcome!
Hello, AndrewPeterT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! - HurricaneSpin    (Talk)  19:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

WPTC Invite
&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 19:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hey there. Welcome to the project. I see you have some interest in some southern hemisphere storms, which is great! There are plenty of storms down there that need help. I write all over the world, but recently have been focusing on both the Atlantic and the southwest Indian Ocean. If you need any help, feel free to give me a shout. I've been on here for too long (8 years in August) and am glad to be of any assistance. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 20:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks! Hurricane Andrew (444) 20:47, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, have you considered writing articles, by chance? You seem interested in the Southern Hemisphere, and there are plenty of articles down there that need help. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:39, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

No, but I can write some articles. Which seasons need help? Hurricane Andrew (444) 23:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Plenty of them do. Mostly, they need summaries written for each storms. 1991–92 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season - this, for example, doesn't have any info on any storms, despite there being a report available. I could give you some pointers in how to write the sections, if you want, or you could look around and see how it's done. Lemme know if you're interested. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:58, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * So I gave you a season there. Mostly what you have to do is write, in your own words, a summary for each storm in the season. Would that interest you? --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Copy and paste on 2013 Pacific hurricane season
Could you please explain this edit. It seem you copied a couple sentences from higher up in the section and pasted them at the bottom, which is not very helpful. Those sentences had to be removed as they were redundant and disrupted the flow of the paragraph. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Thanks, United States Man (talk) 18:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1999 Pacific typhoon season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1999 Pacific typhoon season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- 01:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey, are you still working on 1999 PTS? The GAN has been up for a month. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 20:32, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1999 Pacific typhoon season
The article 1999 Pacific typhoon season you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:1999 Pacific typhoon season for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- 01:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Meow! I like you!

Macman252 (talk) 02:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Hurricane Andrew (444) 12:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)



Noul is Category 5
See the warning and the track file. If you see the storm's intensity updated before a warning is issued, it is probably because the speeds are determined earlier in the track file.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Typo fixing
Thanks you for fixing my typo! :) Dustin  ( talk ) 03:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * No problem! Hurricane Andrew (444) 13:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

30 Hudson Yards Height
I have reverted your edit for 30 Hudon Yards because the sources conflict. See talk page of tallest buildings for my reasons Robynthehode (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

June 2019 WPTC Newsletter
Noah Talk 22:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello AndrewPeterT: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, 𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message 𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Regarding your GAN of Buttigieg
Regarding your request to have a free copy of all of Buttigieg's books, I have two comments.

The first is that the English Wikipedia's resource exchange is probably the best place to request published things that you don't have access to. But requesting full copies of entire books is probably prohibited by copyright, so I'm not sure asking for entire books is reasonable. In any event, that is a better place than the GAN queue page.

The second is regarding due and undue weight. What particular value is there in Buttigieg's books? If there is some information there that is not replicated in reliable sources, is it suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia? If only Buttigieg is saying something about his life, it may not be important enough for us to include... and even if it were, there are some cautions against it at our primary source guidance. Urve (talk) 01:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, Urve. It has been eight years since I have gone through the GAN process, so I do appreciate your comments:


 * A.) I was not aware of the resource request page. However, after reading that page, it appears that my request for full books would be inappropriate even there.


 * B.) My rationale for asking for Buttigieg's books (namely his memoir) was to fill in information gaps that I had been encountering online, especially towards the beginning of his political career. After reading WP:NOR, I see how my plan basically would have been synthesizing information from primary sources.

Hurricane Andrew (444) 02:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking this in the spirit it was intended - just a friendly note. I hope the nomination goes well for you. Urve (talk) 06:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Privacy
Hey. I just wanted to ask you that aren't concerned about sharing your name in Wikipedia userpage? Footy2000 (talk) 16:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, Footy2000. I use a pseudonym when editing Wikipedia. The name you see on my userpage was made up. However, thank you for your concern. Hurricane Andrew (444) 16:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pete Buttigieg
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pete Buttigieg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pete Buttigieg
The article Pete Buttigieg you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pete Buttigieg for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pete Buttigieg
The article Pete Buttigieg you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pete Buttigieg for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess this is an error made by the bot (since the article initially failed its first GAN). The article has passed its GA nomination! Congrats, and thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Pete Buttigieg
Hello! Your submission of Pete Buttigieg at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Almost good to go! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Pete Buttigieg
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Princess Elizabeth
 * added links pointing to Elisabeth of Bohemia, Princess Elisabeth of Hesse and by Rhine, Princess Elisabeth of Saxe-Altenburg, Elizabeth of Denmark and Elizabeth of Sweden

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Appreciation for the Queen Elizabeth RM
I know its late but I just read your requested move proposal for British monarchs, and I came away incredibly impressed by the thought and effort laid out in you proposal. It was clearly well researched and presented as factually as possible, both in the bits that supported your position and counterfactuals. I saw a couple requests to trout you, and felt it appropriate to let you know that even though it wasn't successful it was absolutely worthwhile and germane. Thank you. --50.234.188.27 (talk) 13:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, and thank you very much for your comment. I greatly appreciate your consideration of the substance of and time needed to draft my argument for that requested move. Hurricane Andrew (444) 00:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

New message from Aaron Liu
Hello, AndrewPeterT. You have new messages at [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aaron_Liu/TWA/Earth/2?redirect=no Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)]. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ExpandTemplates&action=edit remove this notice] at any time by removing the or  template. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I am not sure if this is where I am supposed to write my reply to your message. However, thank you for the trout and appreciation for my efforts on Wikipedia. Regarding the Tropical cyclones in 2023 article, I admittedly have not viewed that page. However, the content is certainly within my realm of interest. Hurricane Andrew (444) 23:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! What I meant in my message is that you should respond to some of our messages at that RfC and maybe add a condensed version of that response if you want. Aaron Liu (talk) 23:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Blowing winds
I admire your energy, but I suspect the result at the current RFC will likely be options 1 or 2. At the very least, option 4 will never pass. The tide has (increasingly) turned against the Monarch # of country title style. GoodDay (talk) 20:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message, GoodDay. Yes, I suspected that option 4 was going to be discarded fairly quickly. Hence, I was open to Option 1 and Option 3 as well (and it seems we both personally are open to Option 1 being implemented) . I still have concerns about Option 2 that I will express on the main RfC page. Hurricane Andrew (444) 21:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Nice work
Hello AndrewPeterT. I saw all the tables you did for your RfC analysis at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility/Archive 11 It's nice work. I am doing (kind of set aside temporarily) a similar analysis for article size. You are welcome to check it out at User:Thinker78/Draft MOS:LEADLENGTH table modification. Regards, Thinker78  (talk) 22:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message and appreciation of my work, Thinker78. Admittedly, the table template was not my creation. However, I still believe that it was important for all of the RfC participants to see how the relevant articles were titled in practice versus what the suggested guidelines say. Also, I am impressed by the details of your own article size analysis page! Hurricane Andrew (444) 01:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * We didn't agree, but you put a lot of work into the RfC and I applaud your energy. Others have mentioned this in one context or another, but Shakespeare was right that brevity is the soul of wit and you should try to say what you have to say in the fewest words possible. Just a suggestion. Wehwalt (talk) 00:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

I found your user name very confusing
Hi, I was trying to make sense of the recent RfC, and I found it very confusing, because there was a Hurricane Andrew poster, and also a poster named AndrewPeterT. It only dawned on me right at the end that they were the same poster. May I please suggest you pick one user name and use it for all purposes? Just a thought. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 21:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Mr. Serjeant Buzfuz. Thank you for your well-intentioned feedback. My signature dates from many years ago and was based on a username I had on another website. However, I agree that my former signature was potentially confusing to other users. I have changed my signature to more explicitly reflect my username. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 23:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 23:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Edward I move request
Andrew, that move closure was highly inappropriate. You are most certainly not an uninvolved editor. You made your stance extremely clear at the Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility) RfC, a discussion that ended not the way you hoped it would. Then you made an attempt at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility to overturn the consensus reached at Wiipedia talk:NCROY, which was strongly opposed. You are as involved as one can possibly be. You even discussed this RM with like-minded editors at User_talk:GoodDay. I strongly advise that you revert your closure. Surtsicna (talk) 21:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I strongly agree with @Surtsicna. Simply because you haven't commented in an RM doesn't mean you're not involved. I will also point out that @Tim O'Doherty has already reverted the closure. estar8806 (talk) ★ 22:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Estar8806 Thank you for the update. I have already apologized to Surtsicna about my behavior on their talk page. However, I greatly appreciate your well-intentioned clarification about RM involvement. I have also appreciated your participation in previous RMs I initiated, and I hope that we can productively collaborate again in the future. Hurricane Andrew (444) 23:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I was going to chip in about the closure, but it's all been sorted so there's no need. What I will say is that we've all made mistakes on Wikipedia, but the beauty of the project is that they can always be corrected. From what I can see you're a well-intentioned editor, and as long as you've learned from the experience there's really no harm done. All the best, A.D.Hope (talk) 23:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * What's done is done. Wikipedia is a learning experience so learn from it. Wehwalt (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for your kind words, A.D.Hope and Wehwalt. Yes, there is a lot I have learned from this recent experience. I hope to collaborate with both of you in some way in the future. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

No harm done. GoodDay (talk) 00:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

TLDR
Howdy. Ya gotta get into the habit of shortening your posts. Less is more. GoodDay (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Alright, I collapsed all the quoted text and tried to remove redundant reasoning from my original post. I do fear that users may want links, which is why my posts end up being quite long at times. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

FLC comments
Dylan 620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 13:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Descendants of Christian IX of Denmark has been accepted
 Descendants of Christian IX of Denmark, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Descendants_of_Christian_IX_of_Denmark help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Spinster300 (talk) 22:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Prince George of Wales
@AndrewPeterT Thanks for taking up the article for review. It failed it's previous review due to the nominator remaining inactive for over a month. Hopefully it will passed as GA this time. Take your time but I would appreciate it if the entire process is wrapped up as soon as possible. Looking forward to collaborating with you. Regards MSincccc (talk) 04:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Well thanks for your time and consideration while taking up George's review. But now that you seem unable to do so under certain circumstances, I just wanted to let you know that I am relieve you of your duties for the time being. Meanwhile, you need not bother user Kinsif if the latter is busy to do so and funds the article as short as George's. I have informed another experienced reviewer to take it up. Once again, thanks for your time and hope you have a great day. Regards MSincccc (talk) 08:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Non-neutral notices
Hi, I have undone your non-neutral notices to non-representative talk pages, per the request of an Arbitrator, (Barkeep49). Thank you. 2.28.124.7 (talk) 18:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for undoing the edits. I did not realize that posting Arbitration Committee updates, neutral or not, on non-representative talk pages was against the norms. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 13:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
House Blaster  (talk · he/him) 23:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration case request declined
The case request Persistent WP:IDONTLIKEIT behavior in WP:NCROY discussions, which you filed, has been declined by the committee. You can find an archived version of the case request here. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 18:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexandra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aleksandra Antonova.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Descendants of Christian IX of Denmark
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

"User:184.60.28.232" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:184.60.28.232&redirect=no User:184.60.28.232] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Nickps (talk) 16:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)