User talk:AndrewRobust

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page SkyCity Auckland has been reverted. Your edit here to SkyCity Auckland was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.3news.co.nz/nznews/skycity-admits-failure-after-media-sting-2014070719#axzz3RZ5ApsP5) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:56, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for based on your editing style, it appears that you're the latest incarnation of. I note, for instance, this edit in which what is basically commentary not supported by the sources was added to the article and this edit in which it was wrongly implied that 99% of problematic scenarios conducted at Skycity Auckland did not result in interventions - the source actually says that this was for all 102 "pubs and hotels" tested. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 10:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)