User talk:Andrew Chuprevich

Andrew Chuprevich, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

April 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger One ping only 01:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Stalker. I have my rights to the info that was written on my page. Your as creepy as they come. You watch me as I type every word. Microsoft vs. United States is a FACT!help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.78.99.244 (talk) 02:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, y'know, just for the record: Bushranger. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

My thoughts weren't in forum form. They weren't allowed to be seen in public by just an average user. Only you stalkers blocked me. help So you violate my Countries 1st amendment right. What happens when my Country violates your right to be here in America? You have proven by my ban you won't respect the Law of the land.


 * You're allowed to air your thoughts in public. Wikipedia is not the public.  It is a private website managed by a private foundation, the Wikimedia Foundation, and it's allowed to publish (or not publish) what is chooses, and cannot be forced to publish what it does not wish.  Just as you cannot be forced to say things you do not wish to say, neither does this private website have to do the same.  If you wish to make public declarations of this nature, the public is elsewhere.  This isn't it.  The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not require private business to publish whatever you want them to.  It only protects you from government interference in your expressions.  Since Wikipedia is not the U.S. Government, it is under no requirement to allow you access to it for your own purposes.  -- Jayron  32  03:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Wrong Jayron the first amendment protects my freedom of speech from anyone one trying to stop it including the Government as well. Your Inc. doesn't out weigh the Law of the land.

Keep adding to a case against Wikipedia to by the ban and every comment you all add to it. I dare you to erase my account.


 * People in your house and say anything they want and you cannot stop them or ask them to leave? Tell me more about how the First Amendment requires you to allow people to say anything they want on your private property, and you can't do anything about that?  -- Jayron  32  03:23, 20 April 2014 (UTC.
 * May I also recommend you to WP:FREESPEECH?  Zappa  O  Mati   03:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Is my talk page my talk page? Or an administrators talk page or is it a communities talk page. I thought it was mine alone? Sorry I back spaced to much maybe on your script. How long does it take an average person to come up with a full proof page on Wikipedia? Obviously I have other matters to attend to and don't get a living wage to edit my own material. Forgive me for being a human. That edit page of mine would take YEARS to finish. I make a pretty bold account of what I see, what I hear, and that material isn't even mine. lots of that stuff I wrote on my own talk page I found HERE! So only you administrators can use the material but not us poorer people or that is less educated people in your opinions. What exactly are you banning me for. For what exact reason? If I'm banned and disagree Bushranger should exactly state the claim incident and all. Then if in truth it is I will never come back to this site again. All land is stolen anyway. But I don't steal and I know when I'm unwanted. I'm just waiting for my wife to show up and witness this as well for her eyes before I go. help Yes you would be mad too.
 * No, the talk page is hosted on privately-owned servers, and is no less the property of Wikimedia Foundation than is the chair that a guest uses in your house still your property even when they sit in it. -- Jayron  32  03:45, 20 April 2014.

Fine if I get attacked from the shadows be the shadow clan that you all are just don't use my e-mail to contact me. I won't even use your services any more and tomorrow I will cancel my account. But don't expect me to promote this place or speak highly of it to anyone. I'd rather move on and forget this disgrace. Most people have to pay people who scribe and add to literature and by your attitudes I would never get respect. I'm glad you all have revealed yourselves now before I really did publish something to the open public. Good Night and may God Bless You All and protect you all from Tyranny.
 * You cannot "cancel your account": Wikipedia does not work that way. You were blocked because you are not here to improve the encyclopedia. As for "free speech", XKCD had something to say about that. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:17, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Really does look like I have to lawyer up or maybe not. Imbroglio. Just because you all belong to the elite contributors doesn't mean you can hold my editing rights or my thoughts hostage. You all wouldn't be my Judge. And If I have to walk yet another path in my faith I would do so openly. I have no shame in trying to care for others more than I would care for myself(I invite any editor to look at my talk page). Thank you for showing me your rude cartoon about your opinion of free thinkers. Bushranger. At least I can walk in the light knowing, to me, that I believed so much I would stumble and fall before the world encyclopedia. Now that you know my true nature Bushranger, what instance do you claim that I'm not here to improve the encyclopedia. Sorry if I'm kinda down on $$$ right now and don't have the paper to spare for a ruff draft nor have I had the proper education in how to manage Windows properly or maybe just down right dyslexic. What if I was absolutely right about my claims in my talk page and indeed came to this place to improve the base of information for, not only here, but the world over. I would seriously have to ask you if you enjoy this for your own sadistic pleasure, no doubt do to an experience you had in your life. Well if that's the case here I am and beat away but I don't understand. "Your clearly not here to improve" check on me is by far not checkmate. I offered to leave Wikipedia as respect and not to run away. So if I can't leave, you can stay in your darkness. At least I put my name on the line and that would outweigh any contribution you have made here. Legal advice is free. But to take on bigger people than me ,ALONE, I would need help in every domain I could think of. You could even use a saying in the Bible to mock me far better than your love of that cartoon. So wouldn't the point of trying to improve the encyclopedia be to improve people? Well not all of us have such an easy life. Maybe this is exactly why God wanted me to come here after all. How deep would your faith be if any you had? Please explain is written detail, to me, why have you banned my editorial right? Your short blue line definition won't cover it. Please add this case to the encyclopedia as well. And answer how long does it take an average person to publish in full view of the public. I would even ask others in the shadows mocking me if they ever knew of a case where they made History and wrote about it openly with out an avatar or a false name to hide their Identity. So what if I can be zealous. You are too in my case Bushranger. Get all the friends you need to back you up. You might need them.

help I'm being prevented to verify my e-mail address. I can put my e-mail account up but I can't put in my full password. This problem isn't in any explanation I can find here.
 * You have not been "banned", you have been blocked. Wikipedia is not a place for original thought, nor is it a place to right great wrongs. It's clear that you are only here to push your fringe theory as The Truth, despite the fact that it is not verifiable through reliable sources; this is contrary to the very principles of Wikipedia, which is that information is provided based on verifiability, not truth. As you either will not or can not understand that "free speech" is not a "right" on a private website, show a complete lack of understanding as to both how Wikipedia works and why you have been blocked, and have both indicated you will use sockpuppety and made legal threats, while continuing to use this talkpage as a soapbox for making personal attacks on other editors, your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked. If you are willing to abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including but not limited to WP:V, WP:N, WP:RS, WP:CIVIL and WP:FRINGE, you can request unblocking by contacting the appeals subcomittee at . - The Bushranger One ping only 07:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)