User talk:Andrew Logan Martin

June 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to La ilaha illallah have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: La ilaha illallah was changed by Andrew Logan Martin (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2021-06-25T09:21:53+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to La ilaha illallah. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to La ilaha illallah have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: La ilaha illallah was changed by Andrew Logan Martin (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2021-06-30T16:27:43+00:00

July 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad and the Bible, you may be blocked from editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at La ilaha illallah shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I have to make others put this on watchlist Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I won't stop making edits. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

This is just endless. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I can do anything Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Rather than persistently edit war, you need to explain your changes at Talk:Muhammad and the Bible. Make it clear how what you're adding enhances the article and what reliable sources, preferably secondary, back the changes up. —C.Fred (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I will make edits when inactive. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * What do you mean by "when inactive"? —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I don't won't to say repeated things. I will do what I have to. I don't need to discuss with anyone. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Inactive Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Inactive meaning not active Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Longhair\talk 20:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Yeah nice Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Love you dude keep on doing this I don't get hurt. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I will do what I have to keep on blocking. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Tread lightly. It would be easy to interpret the statement above as you stating that you have no intend of editing cooperatively—in which case your account could be blocked indefinitely because you aren't here to build an encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I have lot of ip address keep on blocking. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I don't care about blocks. I am here to put others on watchlist I will make sure I will have it done. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Longhair\talk 20:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Salim567&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Salim567. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)