User talk:Andrew ferdetta/Science, technology, society and environment education

Amanda's Peer Review
I think it's great that you're trying to expand upon a very important topic when it comes to science education. I think the sources you provided are great and support your claims well. However, I can feel a slight bias towards STSE Education in your writing. The goal of a Wikipedia article is to be as unbiased as possible. I think the best way to edit what you have so far is to go into it with an unbiased focus. When writing it, definitely compare STSE to the old science curriculum, but focus solely on the comparisons. Along with this, I would suggest expanding upon "STSE Education also requires critical thinking skills in the way that older science curriculum did not". What do you mean when you state this? Maybe talk about the different skill sets and thinking sets students use when participating in an STSE curriculum compared to the old science curriculum.

I would also like to mention a few grammatical errors, such as those found in the sentence "Science, Technology, Society and Environmental education usually focuses on the impact of plastic water bottles, toxins produced by industries, Sanitation in developing nations/ nations as well as developed ones, water conservation and the controversial l topic water Privatization, and anything else a student may think of." I would suggest reading over your work again and finding things such as the unneeded characters and unneeded capitalization in some spots. Other than that, this is very well written! Amanda WellsRCBC (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)