User talk:Andrew orhard

June 2014
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Andy Orchard because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 13:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Orchard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Andy Orchard was changed by Andrew orhard (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956505 on 2014-06-24T13:50:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Orchard. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 13:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —S MALL JIM   13:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)