User talk:Andrewdahl

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Andrewdahl. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 17:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Proficiency Paradox Theory
Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Andrewdahl, thanks for creating The Proficiency Paradox Theory!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. no pne has used the term "Proficiency Paradox Theory" on the web before so did you make this up? "Proficiency Paradox" does however appear. Also this page is very like an essay.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Proficiency Paradox Theory for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Proficiency Paradox Theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Proficiency Paradox Theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 06:09, 18 November 2018 (UTC)