User talk:Andrewgrosman

File copyright problem with File:P&H 4100XPC electric mining shovel.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:P&H 4100XPC electric mining shovel.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:P&H 4100XPC electric mining shovel.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:P&H 4100XPC electric mining shovel.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Image copyright issues
Try reading WP:COPYREQ

Alternativly try contacting one of the OTRS queues directly, ( A relevant e-mail address is given on the page linked)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

what gives you the permission to delete all the contributions/research (references) I did to joy global ?
i understand more information can be added but yours appears to be just copy pasted material from somewhere else. I provided many references and other information that you just removed. I will either report this on the administrator board or give you one chance to incorporate at least half of the material I originally provided in the article, in the current edit. if you don't respond I'm going to revert all the information back to what was there originally. A complete rewrite was unecessary given that there were no templates at the top of the article indicating there was anything seriously wrong with it.Grmike (talk) 00:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)grmike

Hello Grmike,

First of all I very much want to incorporate information and references you made into the Joy Global story back into the page. Yours/other's effort in research and writing deserves to be part of any accurate page. More discussion of that moving forward, particularly tomorrow when I get a better chance to discuss this with you. Can I ask what your interest is in the Company, and its history?

Second, while the information may "appear" to have been copy/pasted, feel free to check in a search engine (can't do it in Copyscape of course). 95% of the info supplied comes directly from a P&H Mining Equipment/Harnischfeger Historian who has been with the company for around 33 years.

Third, in direct answer to your question, I have truly have {no} permission, or right, to blow away the page and make it my own. But the information that was there did need some retooling; as you saw in some of my earlier edits: Harnischfeger was misspelled - beyond that the logo was wrong (looked to be copy/pasta'd from an old annual report I think), "joy global" wasn't capped, P&H really only markets their Shovels Draglines Drills, and In Pit Crushers; not all of the parts that might be around 900-count. Other things, but this isn't about it being completely wrong and mine being completely right. Your point is valid and I look forward to discussing this page more with you.

Finally, if you look at my user page, you will probably deduce why I have such an interest in this page. : )

Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks, Andrewgrosman (talk) 21:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

as good as they are, well regarded pubs such as ________ the map is not the terrain


 * for a start I'm going to revert the whole introduction to the way it was before. I think most of my contributions made the article a lot more easier to get core information from than what it is now.  the new information you added is very helpful but to people who want something quick to glance at there's no place on the page that gives a lot of information in a small paragraph.

"Finally, if you look at my user page, you will probably deduce why I have such an interest in this page." then you better not delete any more of my contributions because I could bring up Conflict of interest Grmike (talk) 09:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)grmike

Look forward to collaborating on this with you. Andrewgrosman (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * should we include an image on the page ? maybe one of the people who started the company or joe francis joy's inventions.Grmike (talk) 03:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)grmike

Yes. Working on getting permission from JGI Public Affairs now for Mr. Harnischfeger, Pawling, and Joy to be on the page.Andrewgrosman (talk) 14:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * excellent work ! looks a lot better.  the information you added makes the article a lot more relevant and informative.Grmike (talk) 05:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)grmike

Thx Grmike. Andrewgrosman (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

File:P&H Mining Henry Harnischfeger.jpg
Could you check whether this photo is eligible for even freer licences? Since the person looks not too old on the picture and was born 1855, it could be eliguble for, which would make a transfer to commons easier. The picture would be a great help improving the article about Henry Harnischfeger in the German wikipedia, which until now has no articles on Joy or P&H.--Στε φ (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok sombody already moved the picture to commons, if they accept the licensing its fine with me. It would still be interesting to know which year the photo was taken.--Στε φ (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I am going to do my best to track down a hard copy of this file in the photo archives - will keep you posted. Andrewgrosman (talk) 14:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:P&H Mining Henry Harnischfeger.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:P&H Mining Henry Harnischfeger.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:P&H blast hole production drill.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:P&H blast hole production drill.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:P&H in-pit crushing-conveying system.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:P&H in-pit crushing-conveying system.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Grosman Cabin, from its old location at User:Andrewgrosman/Grosman Cabin. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America1000 15:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Grosman Cabin concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Grosman Cabin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Grosman Cabin


Hello, Andrewgrosman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grosman Cabin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. G13 account of Linguist111 (talk) 17:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

File:P&#38;H overhead bridge crane circa 1888.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:P&, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk)  07:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)