User talk:Andrewlin1/sandbox

Hi Andrew,

Out of your three topics I thin Marine ecosystem would be the most suitable.

Peer Review by Tiffany Desjardins
Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. There is nothing that distracted me on this article. It is well laid out and organized. The article content is presented in an unbiased manner, and is neutral. In my opinion, there are some sections that are underrepresented. Some sections that I think are underrepresented are the “Ecosystem services” section and the “Threats to marine ecosystems” section. I think that there is room for a lot of modifications and improvements to this article. For example, the “Threats to marine ecosystems” section can be improved by providing detailed descriptions of the types of threats, as well as the examples listed under each. In addition, I would suggest that the user supports each fact with a reliable reference, as this is lacking throughout the at the moment. Overall, the information is great and extremely insightful. I can already see the improvements that the user has made to the article. Great work so far! Tiffanyd4L (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Response to Tiffany Desjardins Peer Review
Thank you for looking over my article and trying to help me improve it! I realize that some sections are still under-represented like the "Threats to Marine ecosystems" and "Ecosystem services" sections. I'm still working on the article and am going to attempt to future develop those sections as I do more research. I've also added more references throughout the article to help support the information that I am including. I will continue to make the improvements that I can in the future! Andrewlin1 (talk) 21:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)