User talk:Andrewnpeters

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Joe 02:29, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Cheryl Ladd with this edit, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 14:22, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Note. Please stop adding adding inappropriate categories to wp:BLP articles. See wp:BLPCAT. You can safely add a category to a wp:BLP if the article already shows sourced evidence. I have removed most of your recent additions. - DVdm (talk) 14:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Baker County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Calhoun County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Colquitt County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Crisp County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Decatur County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Dougherty County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Fulton County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Grady County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Lee County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Miller County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Mitchell County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Pike County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Schley County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Seminole County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Sumter County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Terrell County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Upson County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River


 * Worth County, Georgia
 * added a link pointing to Flint River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John McAfee SwiftMail


A tag has been placed on John McAfee SwiftMail, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 17:31, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Andrewnpeters -- re your enquiry about this article on its talk page (now re-deleted), the article was about a company that appears to fail to meet the encyclopedia's guidelines for notability. Wikipedia is not a directory of all companies, so mere existence of a company is insufficient to merit an article. What is needed is in-depth coverage in several reliable sources independent of the company, such as books or national newspapers. See Notability (organizations and companies) for more details. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, this is helpful. Andrewnpeters (talk) 16:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * To explain further; there are 3 problems


 * 1) The criterion for passing speedy deletion as no indication of notability is that there isn ot enough information for any reasonable person who knows WP to think that the subject  might be sufficiently important. I did not see any in the article. There was no claim it was widely used, or technologically significant.It just says what technology it uses.  The other admin who decided to delete the article deleted for another reason; they may have thought the association with McAfee is an adequate claim of importance to escape immediate deletion.
 * 2) We both thought it met the criterion for promotionalism, as the references, as it only advocates the use because of the alledged security.
 * 3) In any case, for an article you need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements  DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC).

Category:Railway stations at college campuses has been nominated for discussion
Category:Railway stations at college campuses, which you created, has been nominated for possible renaming to Category:Railway stations at university and college campuses. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RA 0808 talkcontribs 19:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Privately held companies in the United States has been nominated for discussion
Category:Privately held companies in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)