User talk:Android17171717

October 2020
Hello, I'm Fire star on heat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hindu mythological wars, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''I have gone through all of your 7 latest edits. From those, it is very clear that you are unnecessarily adding some fake information to over glorify certain characters like Karna and Intentionally underrating other characters. If this repeats, it may be treated as disruptive editing and vandalism. Please be careful before you edit articles. Please add your views in article's talk page not in main page. Also add reliable source to support. Thank you and have a nice day'' Fire star on heat (talk) 06:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rent-A-Girlfriend, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Can you please provide a valid source Which ranks arjuna as a athimaharathi Because it is a biased Statment b There is no actual proof And Indrajit was confirmed to be a athimaharathi Android17171717 (talk) 21:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hindu mythological wars, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 11:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

That Wikipedia page is fake There is no credible source stating that arjuna was a athimaharathi Please understand !! Android17171717 (talk) 17:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

You need to stop adding bad sources
We never use our own articles as sources, and for Hindu mythological wars we should be using academic sources. Even if there are other bad sources in an article. See WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. Your risking being blocked. Doug Weller talk 16:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

All those articles are biased None of them are authentic If you really think they are authentic then prove it Android17171717 (talk) 12:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

October 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 10:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Unblock
.

Unblock
Do you think the comments in the unblock requests above are enough of an indication of intention to avoid repetition of the same problems to make it worth giving the editor another chance? JBW (talk) 14:49, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


 * no. I'd like some examples and also to be reassured they aren't going to use sacred texts to make an argument, which would of course be original research. Doug Weller  talk 15:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Android17171717, I think you are unlikely to be unblocked unless you respond to those two points from . I am sure you are sincere in your assurances that you intend to avoid making the same mistakes again, but a problem is that many administrators have time and time again seen editors who give assurances that they won't repeat the kind of thing which led to a block, but who then do those same things again, because in fact they didn't understand. That makes administrators reluctant to unblock unless the blocked editor shows that they understand, rather than just saying that they do. JBW (talk) 19:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)