User talk:Android79/TalkArchive003

Your Self Imposed Hours
Nothing wrong with that. I should spend less time on the Wiki, but I got nothing else to do with my time. No girlfriend, no job, school is done. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:22, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Surprisingly, I'm exhibiting some self-control and keeping my set hours. My problem is, I've got plenty of other stuff I should be doing. This is just too addicting. (What happened to the girlfriend you mentioned earlier?) android&harr;talk 03:26, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Crap. Well...errr....she does not want to be my GF, yet. I know, sounds confusing. It does not help if I am here and she is over there. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Heh. "Confusing" is an apt one-word definition of the fairer sex. Good luck with that. android&harr;talk 03:35, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Its the perils of online dating, but thanks for the well wishses. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 04:23, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Winter rat
"Winter rat" is by no means a neologism. I am 48 years old, and I have know the term and its meaning for most of my life. I also know that it has spread beyond the Syracuse, NY area throughout the Great Lakes region and into northern New England. It is an old, established term, understood throughout the Northeastern quadrant of the United States. There are tens of millions of people who know perfectly well what a "winter rat" is. A Wikipedia entry would be helpful to someone from, say, Southern California, who might have an experiential barrier to grasping the term.
 * Howdy. I realize now that it's not a neologism, but dictionary definitions aren't really appropriate for Wikipedia. However, you might consider making an entry at Wiktionary, Wikipedia's sister project. In fact, one of the possible results of a VfD discussion is Transwiki. Based on what you've told me, I am reconsidering my vote – I may have been a bit hasty. You are welcome to comment at the VfD discussion.
 * You might want to read this guide to the process. It's a bit long; the important things you might want to know about are: 1) the "Votes" part is a bit of a misnomer; it's more about having a discussion to generate consensus on an article; and 2) votes from anonymous users or users with short edit histories are generally discounted. Don't let that discourage you from making your case, though.
 * If you plan to continue contributing to Wikipedia, might I suggest that you create an account? There are many benefits described here. In any case, please sign your posts with ~ at the end (which will insert your IP address/username and a timestamp automagically). Best, android&harr;talk 23:34, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Fabius Bile
Well I did not realize it was a copyright violation and thought it was in the bounds of their IP policy but on closer review it seems I was wrong. I would like an opportunity to start fresh and create a new article about Fabius Bile. I also took the liberty to erase the info on the Ahriman article and will rework that one as well. The Kharn article I did create however. Derktar 03:40, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Leeroy Jenkins
Thanks a ton for helping to clean this up. I started to check the edit histories of all the socks on this page, but there were just too many for me. Gracias! --InShaneee 21:22, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. I've got a set of templates that I use that makes tagging socks and low-edits pretty easy. There are a crazy number of socks coming out to support this article, though. I don't understand why all these people think that a brand-new MMORPG meme somehow belongs in an encyclopedia. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D TALK 21:32, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

My &Tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa;
Thanks. User:Luigi30 (&Tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa;) 03:08, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
Your welcome is appreciated. As is your comment to me about my work.

Wikipedia/Votes for deletion/Hooting Yard
Your commments are respected, although as the entry wasn't written by me, or at my instigation, but rather by a fan of the radio show and the website, the charges of "vanity and self-promotion" seem unfair. That's all.

Frank Key hooting.yard@btopenworld.com
 * Fair enough, but the article was still pretty close to nonsense, and an article written by a devoted fan still qualifies as vanity, IMO. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  01:13, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/L. Paul Bremer
If you strongly oppose the VfD nomination, then put in your vote instead of deleting my comments. Cheers. Ariele 16:30, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I didn't delete your comments. I merely moved them lower in the discussion to reflect chronological order, as I noted in the edit summary. IMO, this makes the discussion easier to follow, but if you want to keep them where they are, hey, no problem. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  16:32, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * My submittal is the second one. The first one was made either in late 2003 or early 2004 by another Wikipedian.  Hopefully this clears up the confusion you may have about my comment. Ariele 17:16, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I can't find any record of a previous VfD discussion for the Bremer article. Do you have a link? A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  21:51, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)


 * It's not in "History" anymore. Haven't been able to find it again.  There were other entries in history that have been removed as well.  I specifically remember voting "REMOVE" when I came upon the article.  The votes were in favor of "REMOVE" back then with just a couple of KEEPs.  Ariele 12:38, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Oops, my mistake. I meant for the article on Paul Bremer to be deleted a year ago as oppose to being removed as a "Featured Article".  I misunderstood the purpose of the forum.  I should have chosen to use "VfD" back then before he was promoted to "celebrity status".  Ariele 14:47, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

My RFA: Thanks
Hi Android! Thanks for supporting my RFA! Sjakkalle (Check!)  13:51, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

VfD policy
Yeah, I'm in the process of working out how on Earth I contribute to that, and what it says at the moment. Sorry if you thought I was clambering onto a soapbox.-Splash 01:58, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. The CSD criteria are unevenly applied, and sometimes abused; I'd like for them to be expanded, but there seems to have been quite a bit of resistance to that in the past. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  03:49, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)