User talk:Android79/TalkArchive019

Colemak
Why has this page been speedily deleted given that it has recently been unprotected to allow a sourced rewrite following a deletion review? (Deletion review/Log/2007 August 27) Qwfpg 11:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I was not aware of the DRV discussion. Do you need the article text restored? android  79  15:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes please -- and the talk page and to-do list if you have deleted it as well. Is there anything that can be done to stop it being speedily deleted again? I've been trying to find a template to put on the talk page to draw attention to the deletion review but I've drawn a bit of a blank. I think the general idea is that if anyone has any objections it would go to a second deletion discussion rather than being speedy deleted again. Qwfpg 17:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I have restored the article, and attempted to restore the revision that contained the todo list on the talk page, but for some reason it's not showing up. Apparently there was a bit of database lag; it's there now. android  79  17:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Audio Imagery
Android79, I created the Audio Imagery page in wikipedia the other day and it was deleted by you on the grounds that there was "No assertion of importance/significance." One of the criteria for defining the importance/significance for bands is whether or not the group is in a major music competition. Audio Imagery is a part of an online contest with Sony/Epic Records for a major record contract. I have the contest site listed as a reference but still the account got deleted. How to I prove or "assert" the aforementioned importance? For your reference the contest site is the following: http://www.musicnation.com Doubledts 15:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the response. MusicNation does allow anyone to submit, however Audio Imagery hasn't just been submitted. They are currently PLACED in the competition. They are one of four groups left and is one week away from a record deal with Sony/Epic. Lawyers were contacted and contracts were signed. How do I prove this to you? Doubledts 02:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Here are the standings: http://hiphop.musicnation.com/standings?round=67 128.118.206.116 15:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC) I skimmed the articles that you sent me. However, I do not think they apply. The only portion that seems relevant would be the "close relationships" portion in the COI article. I am fan and have been for a while. I do know them but strictly on a fan/artist basis. Is this okay?128.118.206.116 16:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No, the criterion is "Has won or placed in a major music competition". It looks like anyone can submit material to MusicNation and therefore be "in" the competition. I'm afraid this doesn't pass muster. android  79  21:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you have a link from the site indicating their status in the contest? I looked, but couldn't find anything. android  79  21:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like they placed 5th and didn't make it to the finals. So much for the automatic record deal, but one could probably make the case that placing 5th in this particular contest meets WP:BAND #9.
 * Before I undelete, though, a couple questions: do you have any sort of connection to Audio Imagery? If so, have you read WP:COI and WP:AUTO? android  79  21:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's fine; I was just concerned that you might be a member of the band or a close relative or friend. android  79  19:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I have undeleted the article. I noticed something odd about the rankings on Music Nation; Audio Imagery has fallen off the list for the semifinals and now appears as #13 on the quarterfinals list. What gives? I don't understand this contest at all... android  79  19:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Henry Rosovsky
On September 1, 2007, I posted a brief entry on the economist Henry Rosovsky. I found him as a non-link on the Wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_economists where he was one of the 5-10% of people listed who didn't have live links to Wikipedia pages.

I also added him to another Wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_famous_born_Gedanians reflecting the fact that he was born in Gdansk (Danzig) in 1927.

While you were correct to assert that the entry was too short, it is not correct to assert that Rosovsky is not notable.

[snip]

Clearly, this information belongs on his wikipedia page. I regret that I did not have time to do it last weekend. I intended to come back to do it. And when I had, the page had already been pulled down.

Please let me know if this explanation is satisfactory and we can create a new, longer entry for Prof. Rosovsky.

Yours truly, David McIntosh Newton, MA david@dsmcintosh.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsm1412 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You don't need my permission to re-create the article with more content, and you certainly don't need the deleted content restored, since it was all of 116 bytes long. android  79  21:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Sharpe's Skirmish (short story)
On 05 Aug 07 you deleted Sharpe's Skirmish (short story) as {db-nocontext}. From the limited info that I could see in the deletion log, this information was drawn from the author's introduction to the revised and extended edition. As a member of WP:NOVELS specialising in Bernard Cornwell's Sharpe series, I request that you restore this page as it is currently the only one of the 20+ Sharpe novels that does not have a separate page listing. If you have specific concerns about the quality or referencing for the former page, please let me know as I can probably do much to fix them - I have just finished reading the book and have my own copy of it to draw from. Restoration of the original information will assist me in not having to reinvent the wheel, and let me get on with improving it instead. Regards --AusTerrapin 10:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The deleted article is not so great. No references whatsoever, no context, and a plot summary written in a fannish style. You could probably do better from scratch if you've recently read the novel yourself. However, no big deal if you still want it undeleted. Just let me know. android  79  19:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes please - even if I end up completely reworking it, at least it will give me an idea of what was there. Cheers. --AusTerrapin 05:14, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Restored. It should probably be moved to Sharpe's Skirmish, since there's no reason to disambiguate. I will do so myself, but the page history is lagging in being restored, for some reason. android  79  13:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. The redirect is working for me. Having quickly skimmed the original content, it is a badly copytyped version of Bernard Cornwell's introduction - hence a copyright violation. Not to worry, I will remedy this shortly. Thanks for undoing GDonato's mods.--AusTerrapin 14:27, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Attack of the Sabretooth
Why was the article for the movie Attack of the Sabretooth deleted? It may not be a good movie, but there a ton of B- movies on Wikipedia that have full articles, so not sure why this one was singled out for deletion? Any chance on getting this restored? Collectonian 17:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The "article" was two lines long, and lent no clues to the fact that the subject was a movie, rather than a novel, a comic book, etc. I deleted it as WP:CSD. You can write a new article if you like. android  79  20:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool. Didn't want to just recreate it with out making sure there wasn't another reason.  The new article will be much better :)Collectonian 00:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

dont accuse me!
I am not trolling! please dont call me a troll! Diroectaable 23:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)