User talk:Andropolis23

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Z, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=455981991 here]. Vrenator (talk) 09:35, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Z. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=455982374 here]. Vrenator (talk) 09:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Boeing 787 Dreamliner has been reverted. Your edit here to Boeing 787 Dreamliner was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://nyc787.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Your edits to CRS SpX-1
Hi Andropolis23,

Thank you for updating the launch date in the CRS SpX-1 article, most especially for using references. There were a few problems with your edits that required me to do some fixing. Not a big problem now, but you left a few of the references in a broken state, making the article look not too pleasant with the broken wikimarkup in the 'live' article. Please don't take the above as criticism, I just want to ask you to check your edits by either previewing them before saving them, or by checking after you save it. If something is broken, please either:
 * fix it,
 * if you can't fix it, ask for help in the article's talk page, or
 * if no-one is available to help, undo your edit.

Also, please read what is considered to be a minor edit in Wikipeida. It will provide insightful. Lastly, I invite you to create your user page (you can do so by simply clicking that last link).

Cheers and happy editing!

-- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  23:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)