User talk:AndyCBaer

Welcome!
Hello, AndyCBaer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ~  Chip &#x1f43a; 02:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

AndyCBaer, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Thank you, but I am so confused as to how to even reply to someone who is incorrect. It is daunting and frankly quite annoying to be accused of promotion when there is nothing to promote. And then vandalism? I don't even know where that came from. I don't have seniority but nothing was done to sell something or make someone feel better. it was all accurate. Sorry.

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guys and Dolls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Elizabeth ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Guys_and_Dolls check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Guys_and_Dolls?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

15-DEC-2019
Your addition to Auctionata has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Spintendo 12:18, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Your addition to Auctionata has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * be nice if i was specifically told of what i did, which was not incorrect. don't mind learning but if someone is wrong, must be a way to properly defend yourself.
 * Hey, AndyCBaer. The problem is your reversions of the changes of others -- three different editors have reverted your edits. If you add them back, you'll be edit warring, which is something you can be blocked for.
 * A related problem is the edit summaries you're using when you make these reversions, which are sounding pretty hostile. Here on Wikipedia, when we have a content dispute with another editor, we go to the article's talk page and discuss it. We assume the other editor is operating in good faith. We don't try to add stuff back over and over with edit summaries that include SHOUTING.
 * I'm seeing that you haven't actually edited at an article talk before? Article talk pages are if anything more important than the articles themselves. It's where editors work together to decide what goes into an article, and for articles on contentious subject the article talk can be many times longer than the article. The article talk for Odyssey III is at Talk:Odyssey III.—valereee (talk) 12:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Waggie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Odyssey III, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waggie (talk) 04:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

EstateofTonyRosenthal
Hi ,

if you have any connection to, you are now required to disclose this, as the account has been blocked as a promotion-only role account per WP:ROLE, WP:PAID and WP:NOTADVERTISING.

If you have a close connection to the account, this is a case of meatpuppetry; if you have created it yourself, this is a case of sockpuppetry. In both cases, please say so and do not edit until the situation is resolved.

If, and only if, you have no connection to the account EstateofTonyRosenthal, you may ignore this message.

Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I first didn't notice how clear the connection is. You do not need to answer anymore; the question was now answered at Sockpuppet investigations/AndyCBaer. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

I do not have any relationship to the Rosenthal Estate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyCBaer (talk • contribs) 18:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That seems to be unlikely, both behaviorally and technically. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

I absolutely assure you have no connection to Tony Rosenthal; I may be passionate, and hot headed about accusations, and a novice as to how to appropriately respond. I now know that whatever I did with respect to Rosenthal is wrong, and I assure you I will not ever attempt to change a page, no matter how much I think it should be changed. To be very frank, there are a number of pages in wikipedia that could be more objective, they include auctionata, which i attempted to revise. Frankly, it is not written with an objective viewpoint. I was recently looking at the revolver gallery page, and i was appalled at the excessive amount of hyperbole and frankly, promotion that you have condoned. I don't know why. But I would encourage you or someone with an objective viewpoint to read that page, and then state how that page has slipped though the cracks. First of all there is no proof that they sell more warhols than anyone else, and i am surprised you have condoned that.

very often when i change a page, i keep looking at it, in an attempt to get it right, and make multiple changes, but my initative of making changes has nothing to do with a vested interest. I don't get paid by auctionata, and have never gotten paid by auctionata, but was surprised as to how inappropriate the page was, yet every time i did made a change it was denied.

i finally gave up.

I assure you that my edits were done in a good spirit, no matter how much any of you think otherwise.

I am very saddened about my overt blocking and i guess i will just pack up and go away even though I will also tell you some of the decisions are without any merit.

I could go on, but frankly some of them are rather bizarre, including the one stroke idea to get rid of the Broadway stage performances of Sam Levene, which is a questionable removal, especially since first of all I didn't add them to begin with, and have only improved many, and every single one of them is supported by your own very site. So very bizarre indeed.

The support for each and every Broadway performance, and granted, if i had the ability now, i would add the requisite support.

To be very clear, 39 Broadway performances are here on playbill, a very respected site. https://www.playbill.com/personrolespage/person-role-page?person=00000150-ac7c-d16d-a550-ec7e754c0002

And what is not there is here: https://www.ibdb.com/broadway-cast-staff/sam-levene-15413

or here: https://www.broadwayworld.com/people/Sam-Levene/

and to call a spade a spade, there is actually more theatre listed as that last site includes touring productions,

But I think it was a vengefull move against me to remove it, and frankly I didnt even add the page so that is annoying and perpexling

== November 2020 == You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)



UTRS decline
I want you to know with 1000% sincerity i am not the estate of tony rosenthal; yes i did edit rosenthal pages, but in no way am i the estate.

furthermore, the estate must have a different ip address as I have never in my life done anything in any way to resemble the estate. I think in all due respect, i have never had a ghost account or a sockpocket as you call it.

In fact, I have been editing without incident for a while, and yes, I got very upset and very aggravated at the accusations which i knew and felt were unfounded.

Accordingly the negative tone seemed like an attack, and unfair one, and I didn't know how to deal with the warnings and the "sigh" remarks that were put upon me. I felt it was unnecessarily personal and unfair.

However, that was a single incident.

As i stated, do a search and you will verify that i don't have the same ip address.

Any accusations are coincidental, most likely caused by a setting that is easily requested google alerts, mentions, or talkwalker alerts, which are not all that uncommon.

I now understand I should have not been so vocal and passionate about the copyright changes, which for the record, i was reading from the website and to the best of my ability in the good old wikipedia effort, attempting to change the words, which i have been told to do in some of my past edits.

That said, I think you have been unnecessary unfair and have jumped to conclusions. however, i can take a lie detector test; i am not the estate of tony rosenthal and the rosenthal estate is not me. not at all. not even remotely.

so you are banning two accounts unnecessarily and unfairly because you smell something which at best is coicedence.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here " . Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see  -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 19:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)