User talk:AndyRose123

May 2019
Hello, I'm Everedux. An edit you recently made to Loud seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Everedux  (talk)  01:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jesse Ketchum. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jesse Ketchum was changed by AndyRose123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952829 on 2019-05-15T13:11:30+00:00

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Loud. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. DBaK (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Getting started
Hello Andy. It looks as if you are having trouble getting started with productive editing here. Please have a look at the Welcome above, which has many useful links in it. In particular, you might find the WP:TEAHOUSE a useful place for advice and information.

On the disambiguation page Loud you seem to making small, almost random, changes which some other editors are clearly not seeing the point of. Maybe try taking your concerns to its Talk page, Talk:Loud where you can maybe explain the capitalization and other seemingly random changes. Continuing just as you are is not likely to lead to a successful editing career, and if you do stuff like this then I think it is likely to be viewed as vandalism.

If you want to edit here I would strongly advise you to slow down, and visit the WP:TEAHOUSE and try to get a picture of how things work here. With best wishes DBaK (talk) 13:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Duke University
Hi again. I very nearly undid your whole edit to Duke University, as it created a number of problems. However, some of your edits there were great so it was a guess which was faster and in the end I left yours then undid some of the collateral damage – please see the edit history of the article for the next few changes I made repairing things that you had accidentally broken, some of which were ridiculous changes which were hard for me to understand unless as carelessness. All of this stuff matters and again I urge you please to slow down and seek some assistance with your editing processes, as I say above. I'm going to have to leave you to it as I have other stuff to do but I wish you luck with your editing here. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 14:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Smart. Dirkbb (talk) 17:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NJA  &#124; talk  18:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)