User talk:AndySawFan

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Leuko 02:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Leuko 02:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

"Eight hours gone" deletion
Hi,

I can understand how you're upset about your article being put up for deletion - one of my articles was deleted in the past as well. However, we have to respect the hallowed wikipedia guidelines, mostly Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. If any reliable sources and significant media attention crop up, it'd probably be safe to put the article back up. In the meantime, you might consider userfying the article.  Ultra-Loser  Talk / Contributions 03:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Detective Tapp
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Detective Tapp meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Detective Tapp. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. --CyberGhostface 13:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lynn Denlon
An editor has nominated Lynn Denlon, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 09:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:448t461.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:448t461.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC) --Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

"Halloweeen (2007) remake" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Halloweeen (2007) remake. Since you had some involvement with the Halloweeen (2007) remake redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC  678  05:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)