User talk:Andy Lau

1. Anti-Secession Law http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-03/14/content_2694180.htm

"Article 2 There is only one China in the world. Both the mainland and Taiwan belong to one China. China's sovereignty and territorial integrity brook no division. Safeguarding China's sovereignty and territorial integrity is the common obligation of all Chinese people, the Taiwan compatriots included."

2. Joint Communique of the United States of America and the People's Republic of China https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Joint_Communiqué_on_the_Establishment_of_Diplomatic_Relations

(7)“The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.”

3. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong

"Hong Kong, officially the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, is an autonomous territory on the Pearl River Delta in South China"

Read more and respect the truth.


 * The People's Republic of China has never actually administered Taiwan. Neither An anti-succession-law made by the PRC nor an American Government communique actually changes anything.  Maybe you should have a look at Taiwan, which is what we're talking about.    Pepper Beast    (talk)  19:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Ghosts in Chinese culture
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Ghosts in Chinese culture. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Pepper Beast   (talk)  20:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Ghosts in Chinese culture
Well, what you said proves that you don't udnerstand Chinese or the history of China at all.

No one denies that the People's Republic of China has never administered Taiwan province which is in fact administered by the Republic of China which retreated from Mainland China in 1949. Taiwan province had been part of China when the government of the ROC administered China and the PRC inherits the sovereignty of and the jurisdiction over China (of course including Taiwan province). Please refer to the administrative division of the PRC on the government website of the PRC which clearly shows Taiwan is a province of the P.R.C. http://www.gov.cn/test/2005-06/15/content_18253.htm.

At the same time, the Authorities of the ROC on Taiwan province never forsake its claim over the sovereignty of China. Please refer to the administartive division of the ROC https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/中華民國行政區劃.

In you don't read Chinese, go home to learn Chinese and then come back to this issue.

You non-Chinese often use "Taiwan". However, don't forget that its official name is Republic of China.

I am fully aware that you are in fact refering to the PRC when you mention China as a common practice. However, it is not objective. China is a historical and cultural concept and either Mainland China or Taiwan province is part of China.

Please refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China. This page shows clearly Taiwan Province is claimed by the P.R.C. but governed by the R.O.C.

Remember, China is only a historical and cultural concept and either Mainland China or Taiwan Province is part of China. Therefore, it is illegal and disrespectful to juxtapose "China and Taiwan".

Of course you non-Chinese neither know nor understand this. Therefore, go home and mind your own business in Canada. How did the Europeans slaughter millions of indegenous people and take their land by force illegally? How have you been treating the Inuits in Canada? Why don't you let Quebec be independent?

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Pepper Beast   (talk)  18:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ghosts in Chinese culture, you may be blocked from editing. Cahk (talk) 08:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Neutural view? The so-called neutral view denies the truth and disrespects the feelings of the people of a country? More than 14 billion Chinese people in both Mainland China, Taiwan province and all Chinese peope overseas strongly oppose the secession of Taiwan province. Has this so-called neutral and objective Wiki respected the view of more than 15 billion Chinese people all over the world?

Hong Kong's official name is Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Hong Kong SAR) of the People's Republic of China as shown by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong. But why did "Ghosts in Chinese culture" read "China and Hong Kong"? Hong Kong is historicall and culturally part of China and now a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China. Do you respect the truth recognised by Wiki itself?

What if Quebec wants independence? What if Alaska and Hawaii want independence? What if other people support the indepence of these states or provinces? What would you think?

All the links cited are either from Wiki or official government website.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. Cahk (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)