User talk:Andyhartman

Image copyright problem with Image:Dan sanders.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Dan sanders.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 16:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Andy,

It may be that your book does not meet the notability requirements for books. Please review it.

Within Wikipedia, Notability is an article inclusion criterion based on encyclopedic suitability. The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice". This concept is distinct from "fame", "importance", or "popularity". A subject is presumed to be sufficiently notable if it meets the general notability guideline, or if it meets an accepted subject-specific standard.

Thanks again for your efforts, and welcome to Wikipedia! - CobaltBlueTony 15:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Built to Serve
It's regretable that you feel as you do. Please note that calling people wikibullies doesn't help. Understand our notability criteria (WP:N) and how they relate to books (WP:BK). Significant coverage by reliable sources (see WP:RS for what that means) is required. Has this book received awards, significant coverage? Is it a best seller? If not, it probably doesn't merit a stand alone article. A mention in its author's biography is usually sufficient - assuming he is sufficiently notable for biographies (WP:BIO). I hope that helps. Carlossuarez46 00:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikibully
A template has been added to the article Wikibully, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Flibbert 01:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RHaworth#Wikibully Anything else? Flibbert 01:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Your last message
If it's not retaliatory, then you have nothing to worry about. An admin will simply delete my proposed deletion, tell me why and life will go on. Flibbert 01:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikibully and speedy deletion
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Wikibully is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Wikibully saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Flibbert 01:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Spam in Dan J. Sanders
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dan J. Sanders, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dan J. Sanders is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dan J. Sanders, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:FirstBank Centre.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FirstBank Centre.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 08:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Bts book.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bts book.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 08:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dan sanders.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dan sanders.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 08:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC)