User talk:Andyman103v

AfD nomination of Raljoball
An article that you have been involved in editing, Raljoball, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Raljoball. Thank you. Somno (talk) 03:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive). Maybe you should check out Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense. Kingturtle (talk) 19:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
 * Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
 * The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_fgadE5WzI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_fgadE5WzI) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to.	Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.  If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly.	Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source.	Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
 * Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites.	 For more information about me, see my FAQ page.	 Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Raljoball

 * 1) I got a kick out of your article. Perhaps you could re-create on http://wikiality.com or http://http://falsipedia.com?  Once it gains traction, I'm sure it will make its way back to Wikipedia.
 * 2) It looks like a variant of Four square.
 * 3) Video was hilarious as well—especially Bradbury's hat.
 * -- DanielPenfield (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Repost of Raljoball
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Raljoball is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Raljoball saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions.
 * This ended up being split into a new article again because you reposted the entire thing on Four square, rather than a one-liner as suggested in the AFD. As it stands, this is a speedy delete. Notifying you as the original editor. Bazzargh (talk) 01:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)