User talk:Andymcmillan

Possibly unfree Image:279044533 l.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:279044533 l.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Fair use rationale for Image:103688271 m.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:103688271 m.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON   Let's talk  05:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:103688271 m.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:103688271 m.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Fair use rationale for File:279044533 l.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:279044533 l.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 07:08, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:279044533 l.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:279044533 l.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Balmoral Show


A tag has been placed on Balmoral Show requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 21:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Andymcmillan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Talk:XOXO (festival), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  CookieMonster755 ✉  18:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Graywalls. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chloe Eudaly without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Unexplained removal of properly cited contents. Graywalls (talk) 02:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Hi Graywalls! I removed the paragraph as the rest of the section is about her history of supporting specific policy, and that one section isn't in line with the rest of the section. I believe it should be removed, or at least added to a separate section. Advice appreciated! Andymcmillan (talk) 15:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It's been on the article for a long time and survived many edits, so that suggests implicit consensus to retain. It used to be titled "controversy" or something, although as suggested in WP:CRITICISM, I changed the headings to be more specific. Where do you suggest it should be moved to? Graywalls (talk) 04:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe the page being relatively minor is more likely to be the cause rather than implicit consensus. The section is out of place and not related to Eudaly's policy record. I believe it should be removed, or added to a separate Controversies section if deemed relevant. Perhaps that's an issue for the Talk page to discuss. Andymcmillan (talk) 15:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey, sorry, that was not "white washing"—the reorganization was to bring the article in line with the formatting of similar articles, and there is a section under Eudaly's policy history that is irrelevant to her policy history. Again I disagree that a WW article about the Commissioner sending an angry email belongs in that part of the article—or frankly in the article at all. Can we have a discussion about this if you're going to continue to revert my edits? Andymcmillan (talk) 15:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't know where this conversation ended but it should take place on the article talk page. tedder (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Welcome, etc.
Hey Andy, nice to see your name popping up a little more. WP:WPORE ("wikiproject oregon") is a semi-active place for those of us that like editing local topics. I'd invite you to watch the talk page there and drop in if you want to highlight an article, ask a question, etc.

Also I see in the section immediately above this that you aren't signing your comments. Just end the comment with four tildes. tedder (talk) 15:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you tedder! Good catch. Andymcmillan (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Build (design conference)


The article Build (design conference) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non notable. per CORPDEPTH and NCORP"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Graywalls (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Build Conference Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Build Conference Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)