User talk:Anearnestcitizen

October 2022
Your recent editing history at Divya Dwivedi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Anearnestcitizen. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Divya Dwivedi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You continue to edit the Dwivedi article, mostly in a disruptive manner, but you have not addressed the conflict of interest noted above. How are you connected with Dwivedi?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not connected with Divya Dwivedi in any manner, edits made to her article are for the larger public good, the whole article about her seems to be a work of paid editing as there aren't as many citations from reliable sources wherever it is required, I will watch this page earnestly and ensure it represents facts without any sort of personal promotion of the person on whome article is based. Anearnestcitizen (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You're a brand new editor. Why would you even be interested in the subject or the article? You're not editing any other articles.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * One has to begin somewhere, Contemporary Indian Philosophy is my subject of interest, I'll be editing more articles with some experience, till then will stick to editing articles of not so well known Indian philosophers. Anearnestcitizen (talk) 13:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing at Divya Dwivedi
Can you please explain why you removed ontology and narratology as Dwivedi's main interest, when the very source you added to the article says Most of her research is in ontology, principles of history of philosophy, and narratology, for which she is known internationally.? Abecedare (talk) 20:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The main discussion of the article was about her views on caste structures and how a radicle revolution would be required to abolish them.
 * could come across only 1 work (a thesis) by her in the filed of ontology.
 * considering that she's known internationally in the mentioned fields i expected a lot more than that. Anearnestcitizen (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Please don't do this since it ends up misrepresenting the message I left you. You are welcome to delete the whole thread from your own talk-page if you wish but not put words into others' mouth. See WP:TPG for more info on this topic. Abecedare (talk) 19:11, 25 October 2022 (UTC)