User talk:Aneesh R.

I, Aneesh R., have been unjustly blocked from editing as a new user because my former friend made an account with my name, and he made that account a Vandalism Only Account. Since he used my IP Address, I am still blocked from editing, and this guy named Widr keeps blocking m again and again! I mean, I don't know how much my former friend vandalized on Wikipedia, but I am getting blocked from editing because of him. So watch out for him and please help me:

Aneesh R. (talk) 00:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Aneesh R., owner of this talk page

This is Aneesh R. This person named Yumla will not believe that my friend created an account on my name and vandalized on Wikipedia. What can I say? I am actually telling the truth. Let me explain exactly what occured: My friend came onto my laptop and created an account of my name on it on Wikipedia. I did not know of this at the time. He went on to vandalize some articles, and it seems he got blocked for that. Soon, I found out what he did, but since now that I knew that I could be an editor on Wikipedia, I really wanted to do that. So because of the block that he caused, I cannot edit on Wikipedia, as I wanted to do for such a long time. Why don't you believe me? I am not joking - I never want to joke when it comes to Wikipedia. So I am really looking forward for an administrator to help unblock me from editing. And if you really, truly suspect this, you an monitor everything that comes out of this account; there will be no vandalism of any sort. Please help me, I truly think this is unfair. Aneesh R. (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Aneesh R.


 * řYou've never edited wikipedia constructively - why the sudden interest and seriousness? If unblocked, what articles would you edit, and what sort of edits would you make? SQL Query me!  01:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Aneesh R. here. First off, I AM the original creator of this account, I'm just not the original creator of the vandalism account. And by THIS account, I mean this account. THIS account has not committed vandalism. So I should not be compromised. This is just so unfair. First, my friend creates a bad reputation under my name, and now I am being unjustly blocked forever because of his doings. And you do not have any proof that it was me myself that did the vandalism from the other account, so you are just blocking me because you think I did it. I'm not kidding. This is what has been keeping me up at night, because my stupid friend vandalized Wiki, and that I am being unjustly blocked. Why can't one administrator just please unblock me? And I swear, you will not see any vandalism from this account. I am struggling with this. It won't hurt anyone if you unblock me, but it will badly injure me if you don't. I'm not kidding. You can even restrict me from Wiki if you see more vandalism from this IP Address. Just someone please unblock me. I want to make helpful edits to helpful articles, mainly about geography and sciences. I want to be constructive about that. Please just help me with this struggle.

Aneesh R. (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Aneesh R.
 * The reason why nobody's buying it is because blaming one's friend, sibling, or classmate is an extremely common and ineffective defence, and as Yamla, SQL, and Yunshui point out your story really doesn't wash. The melodrama also isn't helping your case. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 20:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Aneesh R. here. Please give a reason why you don't believe me! I am not kidding. I don't care if "my story doesn't wash" but I am not joking why doesn't anyone believe me at all? I am not joking, I just want to help edit Wiki. Please. And why would I waste my time typing all of these paragraps if all I wanted to do was vandalize?

Aneesh R. (talk) 21:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Aneesh R. --UTRSBot (talk) 02:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)


 * ( Non-administrator comment ) I'm inclined to just give 'em some rope. And I want to respond to the comment You've never edited wikipedia constructively: I think the edit to Meow was done in good faith.  Anon 126   (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 09:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * - What do you think here, as the blocking admin? SQL Query me!  03:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Their story reeks of WP:LITTLEBROTHER and just doesn't sound plausible. However, I'm okay with an unblock if you wish, on the grounds that we can just immediately reblock if any further dubious edits occur. --Yamla (talk) 11:51, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * IMO, there is one basic flaw in this user's story: How did this other person, who shares an IP address, know to create such an account over a week before Aneesh R. did? If it had been the other way around, I could believe that someone decided to stop their IP-mate from editing Wikipedia by framing them for good hand/bad hand behavior; however, that the disruptive IP-mate created his/her account first would tend to prove this not to be the case. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * As far as I am concerned, I would not even consider unblocking until "Aneesh R." answers the following question. You say "this guy named Widr keeps blocking m again and again". Assuming that the "m" there means "me", you are saying that you have been blocked many times, yet this account has been blocked only once. Does that mean that you have used other accounts which have been blocked? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Aneesh, how do you respond to the above? SQL Query me!  02:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Aneesh R. here. Let me just say that Widr blocked me once, not over and over again. That was a figure of speech, if you understand. I would like to sincerely thank Anon126 for supporting me in this case. Directed To JAMES B WATSONAneesh R. (talk) 17:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Aneesh R.
 * Widr hasn't blocked this account at all, ever. Widr did, however, block . --Yamla (talk) 22:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Which I presume is the account he claims was created by his friend. Again, this story just doesn't wash - it's ludicrous on its face, and the more details get ferreted out the less plausible it is. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 01:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

As you are evading your block via logged-out editing, I have semi-protected this page for a while. SQL Query me! 18:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi yamla, it has been more then six months (I think) so i was wondering if wp:so rule applied now? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18C:500:2B71:1876:F050:910E:3C8E (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You have been evading your block today, albeit only to edit this page illicitly. Whether or not that resets the counter is up to others. If you wish to apply, sign in with your account and make your request via WP:UTRS. You'll need to address your previous violations of WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 20:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

sorry i could not sign in to edit this, you blocked me from editing talk page and thanks for the info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18C:500:2B71:1876:F050:910E:3C8E (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Email
You requested via email that this talk page and several others be deleted. No, sorry. You have to stop engaging in evasion if you want that to happen. Go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO, then maybe. --Yamla (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Email revoked. You've been given a path forward. It's not our problem if you are unwilling or unable to adhere to that path (and our policies and guidelines generally). --Yamla (talk) 19:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 20:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

TPA restored
As per an unblock request at UTRS, I have restored TPA as I think any unblock needs further discussion. Aneesh R. please lodge your unblock request on this page.-- 5 albert square (talk) 20:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)


 * To add to the above, a CheckUser has confirmed that the user has not engaged in sockpuppetry.-- 5 albert square (talk) 20:50, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note that was the original blocking admin here. I revoked TPA back in 2018. This was reinstated by . If the unblock request reasonably addresses the abuse of multiple accounts, I wouldn't object to an unblock under WP:SO, given the above finding of no recent sockpuppetry. --Yamla (talk) 20:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

thank you. 5 albert square, i will lodge an unblock appeal here as you suggested.


 * Aneesh R., I'm not going to review your unblock request, I'll leave it for another admin to do. However what you've put above is not a reason to request an unblock.  What that means is that you need to address the reason for your block and convince the reviewing administrator that the behaviour from before will not be repeated.-- 5 albert square (talk) 22:27, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

thanks 5 albert square, edited it