User talk:Anelson4

Diacritics, Ugg!
Hey, sorry I forgot to warn you guys, there is an old style of diacritics and a new style of diacritics. In the old style, ś is ç, long vowels like ā are â, and ṛ is ŗ. Don't you just love it??!! I've been going through and correcting this on our pages, but if you catch any I missed, you can change it if you aren't already at diacritic overload! -Lotus (talk) 18:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Like other parts of Hindu Law, the giving and receiving of gifts is broken down by caste. Each cast has their own rules and regulations on the topic of religious gifts. As Manu explains, the reason for this is to ensure the protection of all creation, of how things should be. Brahmins can both receive and give gifts. Ksatriyas are good for giving gifts, and the same goes for the Vaisya as well. Manu does not even speak of the Sudras as being related to giving gifts in this part of his text, but rather states, “A single activity did the Lord allot to the Sudra, the ungrudging service of those very social classes.” (Manu 1.87-1.91) Kane says that Brahmins can accept gifts, but only under the right circumstances and from the right people. If a Brahmin has enough to sustain he and his family, he is to not ask for gifts. If, however, he finds himself in a time of trouble and he anticipates struggling for his maintenance, he may seek gift from the King. It is the duty of the King to supply proper livelihood for a Brahmin in distress. Brahmins would not, however, seek gifts from a king that was not of the ksatrya lineage, nor from any greedy king, or a king who disobeys the sastras (Vol II p. 110).

Manu 4.186-194 is given the heading “Accepting and Giving Gifts.” In this passage, Manu makes it clear that the acceptance of gifts is a special occurrence, and should not be gotten used to. If a man, a Brahmin, becomes accustom to this, he vedic energy will eventually become extinguished. Surprisingly, Kane puts this more clearly when he states that, “though entitled to accept gifts, a bramana should not again and again resort to that method, since the spiritual power that he acquires by vedic study is lost by accepting gifts” (p.549 Vol. 4). It is crucially important to know the Law on how to accept a gift, which is why Brahmins are the only ones to be able to do so, since they are learned in the Vedas. It is said that when a man who is not leaned accepts certain gifts, he is then reduced to ashes, like a piece of wood. These certain gifts have the ability to burn up different parts of the ignorant man’s life, such as his land, his sight, his offspring, and his life-force, to name a few. In this way, an ignorant man should fear any gift, for it has the ability to make him sink ‘like a cow in the mud.’ In the same way, the donor must be weary of who really is leaned and worthy of accepting his gifts (vol. II p. 114). It is important also that both the giver and the receiver share the same respect when giving and obtaining gifts. 4.235 explains that, “When due respect is shown in accepting and in giving a gift, both the receiver and the giver go to heave; but when the opposite happens, both go to hell.”

Beyond accepting gifts, Manu says that a man should tirelessly give sacrifices and offerings daily in the spirit of generosity. If a man gives every day with the right spirit and from his justly earned wealth, he will become boundless. He is to pick a worthy recipient, a Brahmin, and give as often as he can to this man. Doing this religiously solidifies hope that one day he will encounter this recipient, who will save him from all that is. (4.226-228)

When it comes to the gifts that are being given, each item brings the donor something to his own life. For instance, He who gives sesame seeds obtains desirable offspring, he who gives food obtains inexhaustible happiness, he who gives an ox obtains bounteous prosperity, he who gives land obtains land, he who gives a bed obtains a wife, and the list goes on. This gift of the Veda, which only a Brahmin would be able to give, far exceeds any other gift, however.

It is important that the giver is truthful about what or how he has given a gift or sacrifice. Sacrifices are lost by telling a lie about it. In the same way, a man must not flaunt his asceticism, for by doing so, this too will be lost. (Manu 4.236-237) The Naradasmrti also touches on the topic of gifts in the Dharmasastra, but only briefly. This smrti takes on a different approach to giving and receiving gifts than Manu. It is a more concise advance on the subject. Here we find that there are specifically four kinds of gifts in legal procedures: what should and should not be given, along with legitimate and illegitimate gifts (NMS 5.2) Going further into these stipulations, it says that there exists “eight kinds of things which should not be given, one kind of thing which may be given, seven kinds of legitimate gifts, and sixteen kinds of illegitimate gifts.” (NMS 5.3) The Naradasmrti is easy to read in this way, because it has a funnel effect. The topic of food is started rather broad with the four classifications of gifts, and gets narrowed down into lists of examples of each of the types of these former classifications.

Kane Volume IV focuses much of its literature on penances. This different subject, however, has much to do with gifts. It is said that on the day of commencing penance, the sinner must, among many other things, give dana (gifts such as gold, cows, etc.) to the Brahmanas and feed them (p. 121). Earlier in this volume, Kane references other smrtis that write on this same act. Gold, a cow, a dress, a horse, land sesamum, clarified butter and food are all gifts that destroy sin. Also, the gifts of gold, cows, or land can quickly exonerate sins, even those committed in a previous life. It is understood that gifts are the principle expiations for Hindu men (52).

Once accepted, a gift is irrevocable. “What is promised should be given and what has been donated should not be taken back.” (Vol !! p. 886). This means that if the donor promised a gift to someone, he must give that gift, or he will become a debtor. The only time that a gift transaction need not be completed is when the donee is guilty of irreligious or improper conduct. Otherwise, any gift given cannot be revoked, and any gift promised could result in debt.

The knowledge of gifts in Hindu Law is important because gifts are used also under the topics of varna, food, sin and penance, duties of the King, and so on. Anelson4 (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)