User talk:Anetek

Welcome!
Hello, Anetek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 12:58, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Edits by banned contributors
Regarding this edit... According to banning policy, "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a ban, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule". That user was indefinitely blocked and edited using an alternative account in violation of policy. Hence my removal. Could you please give me a reason, why the removed comments would be helpful for anyone? Please note that the comment was not about improvement of content, as suppose to be on the article talk page, but irrelevant soapboboxing and a personal attack. Thanks, My very best wishes (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The discussion you are trying to make disappear took place before the user was banned and was thus not in violation of any ban. Anetek (talk) 00:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh no, that user was indefinitely blocked in February . All edits they made from the new (sock) account fall under this policy. But you did not answer my question: what do you think was so valuable in his edits I removed? I said in edit summary: "if anyone needs it". So, why do you need it? My very best wishes (talk) 01:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Please realize that your actions are unusual. I have seen many users who remove or collapse irrelevant soapboxing on article talk pages, but never saw anyone who would edit war to restore such comments except the person who placed such comments himself. And you did not even edit this page or participated in discussion. I also noticed that you both edited the same obscure pages, one after another . Banned user said that he edited with a group of students. Are you one of these students? My very best wishes (talk) 11:53, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SORM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glasnost Defense Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aleksei German. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Memorial (society)
As it has its own category that is the appropriate place for most of the categorisation.Rathfelder (talk) 09:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Internet censorship in Russia
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2016/russia. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2019
Your addition to National Armed Forces has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mitragyna speciosa; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 18:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)