User talk:Anette Sayani

June 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. —S MALL JIM   10:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear Yamla, I do not wish to directly make edits to the page 'Metropolitan Stock Exchange'. As suggested by the COI policy, I will submit a request to update information on the page. I wasn't aware of this process earlier but I'm now clear on it after having read the policy. I previously claimed that I had no conflict of interest because I wasn't aware of the term in the sense that is used by Wikipedia's COI policy, but now I know better. As far as the promotional and advertorial claim is concerned, I believe you misunderstood me, I simply wish to state that the edits I request are purely to update the information currently being displayed since, most of it is outdated and incomplete to some extent; I believe that falls under Wikipedia's mission to provide complete information to the public.Anette Sayani (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Blocked
As you refused to follow the instructions given and as you are only interested in violating WP:COI, I have blocked you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 09:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

You were warned to read and comply with WP:COI and you refused to do so. You need to explain your refusal. We aren't interested in unblocking you just so you can continue to write about subject areas for which you have a conflict of interest. What other subject areas would you write about if unblocked? --Yamla (talk) 13:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

If you think you hold no conflict of interest, I'm afraid you lack sufficient competence to edit here. It is hard to imagine a more direct conflict of interest than that. --Yamla (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

You will not be unblocked to write about the Metropolitan Stock Exchange, nor anything else for which you have a conflict of interest. What else, if anything, do you wish to write about instead? Why did you falsely claim you had no conflict of interest? And why do you now falsely claim you have no promotional or advertorial interests, when you admit you are employed by that organisation? --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear Yamla, I do not wish to directly make edits to the page 'Metropolitan Stock Exchange'. As suggested by the COI policy, I will submit a request to update information on the page. I wasn't aware of this process earlier but I'm now clear on it after having read the policy. I previously claimed that I had no conflict of interest because I wasn't aware of the term in the sense that is used by Wikipedia's COI policy, but now I know better. As far as the promotional and advertorial claim is concerned, I believe you misunderstood me, I simply wish to state that the edits I request are purely to update the information currently being displayed since, most of it is outdated and incomplete to some extent; I believe that falls under Wikipedia's mission to provide complete information to the public.Anette Sayani (talk) 12:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * That actually is not Wikipedia's mission. Wikipedia is not for merely providing information. See WP:5P for information on what Wikipedia is about. 331dot (talk) 12:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Alright, can you please help me out with updating the content of the page 'Metropolitan Stock Exchange'? That page holds outdated and incomplete information. If you refuse to unblock my account; please suggest an alternative solution. Anette Sayani (talk) 16:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I suggest that you use your company website or social media to provide up to the minute current information and allow independent editors to edit. Or, tell what other topics you might edit about in which case you may be permitted to make edit requests. If you have no interest in editing about topics unrelated to your conflict of interest, there us nothing more to be done here. 331dot (talk) 16:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Understood, however, this information I speak of is already up on the company's official website and social media handles. Is there a way for me to make this evident to independent editors through Wikipedia?Anette Sayani (talk) 10:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No, because if you did, they would no longer be independent editors. Wikipedia is primarily interested in what independent reliable sources say about a subject, not what the subject wants to say about itself. You are free to use your company social media accounts to encourage interested persons to follow those sources for up to date current information. Wikipedia does not claim to be a reliable source for current information because, again, we are only interested in what third parties say about a subject. It takes time for those sources to get information. As I said, if you are uninterested in editing about subjects unrelated to your conflict of interest, there is nothing more to be done here. 331dot (talk) 10:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Understood. On a side note, currently, the page displays the following information: 'Key People Latika S Kundu (MD & CEO)'; however, this is highlighted in colour red. I'm guessing the reason behind this is the lack of citation; in an attempt to retain this piece of information; I would like to provide the following source: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/metropolitan-stock-exchange-names-latika-kundu-as-new-ceo/articleshow/74604156.cms I trust this is a valid form of citation, please correct me if I'm wrong.Anette Sayani (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
 * The red simply means that there is no article about that individual yet. 331dot (talk) 13:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)