User talk:Anfernee01

Era style
You must follow WP:ERA. Fascinating that you would clearly argue that a Muslim or Buddhist site would need a Christian era style. Doug Weller talk 14:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Doug, I would not agree that a Buddhist era site necessarily needs a Christian era styling, however for a site such as Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem, it stands as one of the most revered Jewish/Christian/Muslim sites. Since we are not using the Islamic Hijri calendar, BC is the most appropriate.
 * In my personal opinion, BCE/CE reeks of LatinX vibes where people are trying to be politically correct where it is not necessary. Our current year 2022 is not the common era for Muslims. Their year currently is 1444 AH, so common era sounds very western-centric. How about the common era for any civilization that traditionally did not use the Gregorian calendar?
 * I still find it difficult to believe that saying "Before Christ" or "Anno Domini" is considered offensive. when scholars treat calendars such as the Hijri calendar without such scrutiny. Anfernee01 (talk) 15:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * To cut the craps, these are the rules decided by the Wikipedia Community and these rules you must obey in order to edit here. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * What about the Wikipedia rules of civility, etiquette, and assuming good faith? How am I not following the rules? There a numerous articles in Wikipedia that have BC instead of BCE. Hardly seems to attack any guidelines. I did not know Romanian Nazis were at the head of the "Wikipedia Community." Anfernee01 (talk) 17:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, so you know by rote three of our rules but you seem completely unaware that you have broken two of our rules. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You broke the rules by shutting down my opinion and saying "cuts the craps." I simply made a change to an article. Leave it at that or go back to your World Economic Forum headquarters. Anfernee01 (talk) 18:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Quoted by tgeorgescu (talk) 18:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * So it is against the guidelines to use BC era terminology? Anfernee01 (talk) 18:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Now that you ask, no, it is not always wrong. But some article are traditionally BC/AD, while others are BCE/CE, and they should retain their status unless serious talk page consensus dictates otherwise. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * And, frankly, go back to your World Economic Forum headquarters seems to me an irrational rant. I cannot make heads or tails out of it. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm actually laughing out loud that I go to make a subtle change to a wikipedia article and moderators all over jump in and attack over something so trivial. You said to "cut the crap" when I was asked why I did something and I explained myself. As you clearly state above, some articles have it the way I have it and some do not. Why could you not leave it then and pass on by? WEF want to monitor speech and decide what is misinformation. That sounds very rational and in line with everyone here today. Anfernee01 (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Quoted by tgeorgescu (talk) 19:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Well that was a pontificating, pompous, and pointless response about the meta of company culture. What I find irrational is Wikipedia clearly has articles using BC and AD, so I make a benign change to reflect that, and the censorship police find fault and attack something so benign.  You argument is irrational and, frankly, you have wasted your own time.  The clear fact that you have countless articles with BC and AD era styling is the proof that you are 1000% incorrect.  Go away now, as you have hive mind written all over you.  All this because instead of a good faith argument, you appear me with the "cut the craps".  You are the bad faith and arrogant actor here. Anfernee01 (talk) 20:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You're obviously not listening. I suggest that you read WP:ERA again. Unless you can convince the Wikipedia Community to change this rule, you have to obey it. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The rules say either style can be used and to make it consistent throughout the article. It had both styles in the article and I made it consistent. You are wrong and have no life. Anfernee01 (talk) 11:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No, you didn't make it consistent and you changed from the established style with no talk page discussion. Doug Weller  talk 14:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The rules say either style can be used and to make it consistent throughout the article. It had both styles in the article and I made it consistent. You are wrong and have no life. Anfernee01 (talk) 11:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No, you didn't make it consistent and you changed from the established style with no talk page discussion. Doug Weller  talk 14:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Anfernee01, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I was attacked by this moderator and I will submit a report because I feel attacked. Anfernee01 (talk) 18:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia does not have any moderator. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If, IF, you were attacked, that does not give you the right to call anyone a "Romanian Nazi". Slatersteven (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Ahhh the ever vigilant justice warrior. Always the moral arbiter. Anfernee01 (talk) 18:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Always the lack of good faith. Doug Weller  talk 20:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * We have rules, you are expected to obey them. This will be my last piece of advice to you, read wp:npa, and stop making personal comments. Slatersteven (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No. Terrible institutions should be dismantled. This article had both era formats and I followed the rules and tried to make it consistent. I guess you don't even know your own rules. Anfernee01 (talk) 11:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Solomon's Temple—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 12:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Can you kindly clarify? It is objectively constructive to have the era styling uniform and consistent throughout a page as noted in the WP:NPA. Anfernee01 (talk) 14:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Where, besides the references, did the article use BC before you made your changes? -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It was there multiple times. You banned me though so I refuse to further support this hive-mind group of incels. Amazing how adjusting era styles bothers these incel moderators at wikipedia so much. What a great open source platform. There is definitely no corruption that goes on here. Good faith actors run this. Anfernee01 (talk) 15:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Final warning re era changes
Do that again and expect an indefinite block. Doug Weller talk 14:10, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hehehe I will keep doing it :) You are the problem. Anfernee01 (talk) 14:37, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Ohh just indef them, and from the sounds of it a range block may be in order, as that read like a threat to wp:sock (and yes I am all out of wp:agf clearly trolling (love the use of BC of all the trivial nonsense you can get a ban over)). Slatersteven (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * It seems English is not your first language, so I will make this easy for your small mind... perma-ban me. I would rather be completely blocked than be associated with you incel moderators. Enjoy! Anfernee01 (talk) 15:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 16:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I have been so mistreated by this community of bad faith I want nothing to do with it. Help me delete my account. I never want to contribute to or use this product again. These moderators are cancerous. Anfernee01 (talk) 01:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Accounts cannot be deleted. Log out and ignore Wikipedia. Johnuniq (talk) 01:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)