User talk:AngChenrui/Archive 1

Panama (ad system)
A template has been added to the article Panama (ad system), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author.  Dei z  talk 14:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Scrolling references/notes
Hi there. I notice you changed the reference/notes sections on Singapore and Los Angeles, California to scrolling style. However, this is not encouraged as it causes all sorts of problems in readability, accessibility, printing, and site mirroring and it is not guaranteed to work in all browsers. The relevant guideline can be found here. Thanks. Green Giant 22:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Western Islands Planning Area
I suggested and placed your hook on the next DYK update. I am concerned that someone may want to merge the article with Jurong Island. Your article is interesting, however. Archtransit (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, noted. I doubt merging the article with Jurong Island will be a good idea. There are still some islands in the Western Island Planning Area that is not part of Jurong Island  Angcr (talk) 12:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * If there is indeed such a suggestion made, please do inform us. It makes zero sense to merge the two when Jurong Island is just one island out of plenty others in the Western Island Planning Area, dominant as it may be.--Huaiwei (talk) 15:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Agreed. However, I don't exactly know what the other islands are. Angcr (talk) 06:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Email please
Hello, can I have your email address as I would like you to send you an invite to read a private page. I will disclose more details to you in an email. Thanks. Terence (talk) 12:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok. I would like to know the medium in which I will send you my email address. This is because I do not wish to reveal my email address publicly. Thank you.  Angcr (talk) 12:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Gmail. Terence (talk) 10:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Singapore Airlines Flight 380
I have nominated Singapore Airlines Flight 380, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Singapore Airlines Flight 380. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Russavia (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!
-- Rai - me  22:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Marina Bay Financial Centre artist impression.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Marina Bay Financial Centre artist impression.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Changes to list of tallest buildings in Singapore
Each of the formats will have their own pros and cons. The ones used in the examples you cite has the advantage of being asthetically pleasing, but do note that they can cause huge white spaces to appear should any larger screen sizes and/or resolution cause the tables to expand horizontally, causing the graphics to overrun the tables by varying degrees depending on screen size/resolution. There is no foolproof way of preventing this from happening using that format. The format I introduced is based on National airlines, and while it prevents users from viewing all graphics immediately, has the advantage of actually showing more clickable images on screen. The disadvantage is that it can take much longer to load on slower systems.--Huaiwei (talk) 13:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, noted. I have increased the size of the images, to make it more visible to viewers. Thank you. Angcr (talk) 13:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of CPF Building
I have nominated CPF Building, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/CPF Building. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  U z E E  02:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Fuji Xerox Towers, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Hong Leong Building, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid (talk) 22:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

DYK - Springleaf Tower
-- Seeing that none of the administrators have posted notice of the usage of my DYK hook, I shall place it up here myself, for personal records. Thank you. Angcr (talk) 12:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC).
 * Actually, I did. --BorgQueen (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:New Singapore downtown possible look.png
Thank you for uploading Image:New Singapore downtown possible look.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Marina Bay Financial Centre artist impression.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Marina Bay Financial Centre artist impression.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Student Leaders Convention
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Student Leaders Convention, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Student Leaders Convention. J Milburn (talk) 11:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Caning in Singapore schools
Alarics (talk) 15:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Alarics (talk) 15:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there AngChenrui, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:AngChenrui/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paper umbrella
A tag has been placed on Paper umbrella requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Broom icon.svg. I went ahead and deleted the article. When your userspace draft is ready you can use the "move" tool to move it to the proper title in mainspace. If you need help I'd be happy to do it for you. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:51, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hwa Chong Institution
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Paul the Octopus
Hello! Your submission of Paul the Octopus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mikenorton (talk) 12:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi AngChenrui, thanks for following up on the hook! Just so you know, I inserted the word "the", which I suspect you'll agree with. Cheers, Melchoir (talk) 19:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks a lot too for the active support. I actually added "the" to the hook too, but perhaps you did it before I did. Still, everything's settled and I look forward to its appearance today. Cheers. AngChenrui (talk) 01:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Paul and Mani
20:30 UTC 11th would be Queue 3 not 4. See comments is special events area. — Rlevse • Talk  • 14:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Noted. Continue discussion here. AngChenrui (talk) 14:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Agh, queue 4 is right. The time zone thing confused me.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 15:00, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, no problem. I myself almost thought of whipping out a calculator to figure out the exact publication timings. Cheers, AngChenrui (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Paul the Octopus
Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Mani the Parakeet
Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for your DYK nominations and hard work with both Paul the Octopus and Mani the Parakeet. – S Masters (talk) 12:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem, pleasure. Thanks for the active support too! AngChenrui (talk) 12:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Danny Valencia
Thanks. It looks as though there was a massive vandal-like unexplained deletion of much of the article, all RS-supported. It has been fixed. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 14:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem, a pleasure. I truly hope your article's DYK nomination gets featured, it's deserving. (And a motivational quote now and then, if you know what I mean, would do good) AngChenrui (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Yes, I know what you mean.  It's a pleasure to work with a constructive editor.  Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 14:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Harriet E. Derman, 18th Legislative District (New Jersey)
You have marked this DYK nomination as verified. However, my character counter consistently gives 204 as the length of the hook, which is over the 200 character limit. Sorry, but I have un-checked the entry for now. Could you take another look? It could be that the character counter I am using (this one) is screwy. Also, I am not sure about the protocol of including two articles in the same DYK entry. Is this allowed? I wanted to double-check this point. Nsk92 (talk) 16:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, never mind, I was counting the characters incorrectly. I also got advice from others that double hooks are allowed. Marked again as verified. Nsk92 (talk) 17:15, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've taken another look, yep it's all fine. Cheers, AngChenrui (talk) 19:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Should have been addressed to you
here :)--Mbz1 (talk) 17:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, thanks for alerting me! You must accept some credit too. AngChenrui (talk) 08:46, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bukit Timah Monkey Man
Hello! Your submission of Bukit Timah Monkey Man at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nsk92 (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK recheck
Hello, just wanted to say I appreciate the editing on the Petitcodiac River article, and that I left a response on the DYK nomination page (under 7 July). The tag can be removed if absolutely necessary, but if I can, I'd appreciate leaving it on until the article goes on the front page. I shouldn't be more than a couple more days, though I'm not sure how long the queue is. Regards. Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  23:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've made the necessary corrections, as noted on the DYK page. Thanks. Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  15:42, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dzungarian Gate
Thanks for the help.

You wrote:

Your submission of Dzungarian Gate at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AngChenrui (talk) 09:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not a major issue, just asking for a decision between the two hooks. I posted this notice because of its urgency - the nomination's running old and might get deleted in a day or two's time. Regards, AngChenrui (talk) 09:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I have stricken the first hook at the nomination page, the second hook is fine, and, yes, actually better. The 3000 mile wall comment is a verbatim, I have provided a link to p415 of Carruther's Unknown Mongolia, the 3000 miles refers to the entire chain, including the Altai mountains, the Tien Shan and so forth, of which the Dzungarian Alatau is only the immediately local portion.

Thanks for the help. μηδείς (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I delinked Dzungarian Alatau from the ALT2 Hook. There does not appear to be a relevant article.  I assume the hook is good to go.  Let me know if there are any other issues on my talk page.  Thanks for the help.μηδείς (talk) 18:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for octopus
DYK statistics for the octopus. Best.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, It ranks top? That is amazing. Thanks for the notice, I'd never have realised otherwise. It's a joint top-four nominators on the list, and that is excellent. Cheers, AngChenrui (talk) 09:34, 15 July 2010 (UTC)