User talk:Angel.angelescu

Speedy deletion nomination of Mercenar Network


A tag has been placed on Mercenar Network, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Mercenar Network and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Mercenar Network
Hi there Angel.angelescu! I saw that you added a hangon tag to a page which you created, Mercenar Network. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD G11. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Mercenar Network, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:02, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

advice
As reviewing administrator, I had to delete the article.

You need to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases  You also need to write like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise it, say what it does. don't talk about the overall importance of the field it's in. And, do not copy from a web site -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone with not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. For further information see our FAQ about business, organisations, and articles like this.

If you have such references, then you can recreate the article.  DGG ( talk ) 18:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)