User talk:Angel3009

July 2014
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Umesh Kamat with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 05:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pune Via Bihar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Flyer22 (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eka Lagnachi Teesri Goshta, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Eka Lagnachi Teesri Goshta was changed by Angel3009 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880079 on 2014-08-01T09:49:35+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pune Via Bihar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Pune Via Bihar was changed by Angel3009 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963889 on 2014-08-02T08:25:40+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:25, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Umesh Kamat. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 05:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.