User talk:Angel maureen

May 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Usman dan Fodio has been reverted. Your edit here to Usman dan Fodio was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://civilization-v-customisation.fandom.com/wiki/Sokoto_(Usman_dan_Fodio)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Women in Nigeria, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pressure cooking, you may be blocked from editing. ''
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

When you replace a "citation needed" tag with a source, the source has to actually verify the content. The link you added to Pressure cooking did not say anything about safety valves, which was the information that needed verification. Furthermore, the source did not meet Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sources. bonadea'' contributions talk 18:44, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * On another note, I don't know if you co-opted this tag to discretely spam but before you edit again, explain why you included this url on that article and what relevance it has to literally anything? Praxidicae (talk) 18:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please note that sources must explicitly support the material that they are next to. DrKay (talk) 19:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I asked you above to please respond before editing again. You've since added another inappropriate source. Please cease editing mainspace and respond to the concerns here. Also pinging who warned them above. Praxidicae (talk) 19:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I really don't know how to get your attention at this point or whether you know that you have a talk page which has numerous warnings but given nearly edit of yours has been reverted, please stop editing. I'd really not have to go with a heavier option but if you continue without engaging, I will request a block from editing mainspace or possibly an outright block from the project. Praxidicae (talk) 19:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

The source you added at Mazda MX-5 was a wikipedia mirror. That is, a website that has copied its content from wikipedia. Clearly, we cannot use such "sources" on wikipedia, as they are WP:CIRCULAR. DrKay (talk) 19:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * You just did exactly the same thing at Lyre despite my explanation. https://24grammata.com/the-lyre-%ce%b7-%ce%bb%cf%8d%cf%81%ce%b1/ is copied from wikipedia, and therefore cannot be used as a source. I do not see how http://www.hellenicgods.org/the-lyre-of-apollo supports the material in the article about birthplace. DrKay (talk) 20:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 20:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with... Please how will i know the articles or website pages that is acceptable to be used as a citation source. secondly, how will i remove a source that is not accepted by wikipedia. Thirdly, is the citation date a criteria for accepting an article as a reliable source. thanksAngel maureen (talk) 10:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Angel maureen (talk) 10:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I am glad you are finally responding to the issues brought up here. To see what types of sources Wikipedia requires please take a thorough read of WP:RS and WP:ELNO. Praxidicae (talk) 12:18, 18 June 2020 (UTC)