User talk:Angela154545

Proposed deletion of Rascalism
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rascalism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Neologism with no claim in article of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  22:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. I'm afraid rascalism is not a new word - it has been around, according to the New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, since the middle 19th century; and in any case, Wikipedia is not a dictionary and articles need to be more than just a dictionary definition. You could submit it to our sister project Wiktionary, which doesn't seem to have it, but you'd better not attribute it to Prof. Mirson or claim that it is new. For more information about contributing to Wikipedia, have a look at the Welcome Page, the Five Pillars and the guide to writing Your First Article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)