User talk:Angela Vicario

July 2014
Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 09:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Though the name suppression order doesn't apply, there are Wikipedia policies that govern how we write about living persons. There's a policy about reliable sources that says, among other things, that blogs are largely not acceptable as sources. There's also a policy about articles about living persons that says that a person is considered innocent until convicted, and as I understand the source the conviction was overturned. It also says that those articles "must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy". Because of this, I really think that you ought not to restore the section. Sjö (talk) 18:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

2010 Queenstown suppressed indecency case
In light of recent discussion on a certain biographical article, allow me to draw your attention to stub article 2010 Queenstown suppressed indecency case. It may be possible to discuss on the new article's talk page whether to name the alleged perpetrator and the correct way to do so. Nankai (talk) 09:42, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Please read this warning carefully
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 21:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Please note that I'm giving you this warning after having to clean up some of the editing you've done on Grahame Thorne, talk:Grahame Thorne, Talk:Derryn Hinch, etc recently. As you have been told by other users already, Wikipedia's biographies of living people policy is extremely strict on the matter of sourcing negative content about living people. Blog posts, especially self-published ones, are not adequate sourcing for such potentially defamatory content. This "BLP" policy applies everywhere on Wikipedia - articles, article talk pages, and user talk pages included. This means that unless and until you are able to provide high-quality reliable sourcing backing up such negative content, you may not place that content on Wikipedia. Anywhere. Not on article talk pages and not on this talk page. If you do add such content again, you may be subject to discretionary sanctions as described above. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 21:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)