User talk:Angelaah Sharma

Hello,

I am a newcomer on Wikipedia and would like to have a feedback about my page and to understand better how may I publish on Wikipedia? Regards, Angelaah

Speedy deletion nomination of Angela Momandian


A tag has been placed on Angela Momandian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DanielRigal (talk) 23:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angela Momandian


A tag has been placed on Angela Momandian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DanielRigal (talk) 20:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Rakesh Jhunjhunwala. ''It is clear that your sole purpose here is to promote this book and its author, who is presumably yourself. This has to stop now!'' DanielRigal (talk) 11:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Spamming
I have received your email. I do not respond to spammers by email but I will reply here for clarity and to create a record of your actions:

"'who are you? I know personally Mr Rakesh Jhunjhunwala and I am the author/ writer of Rakesh Jhunjhunwala 'The Indian Dream' under Jaico Publishing House in India. Why do you keep deleting an objective issue about Mr Jhunjhunwala?'"

To address your specific points:


 * Who I am is none of your business.
 * Who you know is not a help here. In fact it demonstrates a clear conflict of interests and serves to prove that you should not be editing articles about people you know.
 * You confirm that you are the author of the book that you keep on spamming. That is a further, and even more damning, conflict of interests. The fact that your use of Wikipedia is solely limited to promoting your book makes this even worse.
 * You can't claim "objectivity" when you have a financial and reputational interest in promoting your (as far as anybody can tell) non-notable book.
 * This is not about Mr Jhunjhunwala. This is about your behaviour on Wikipedia.

It may be that your book will become notable. If that happens other people, who have an objective view of it, will write about it on Wikipedia. You will not because of your conflict of interests!

You do not get to promote your book on Wikipedia. This is an encyclopaedia not an advertising board. You have no right to abuse the resources of a charitable foundation to gain free advertising.

You are already on final warning. This stops here or you will be blocked from editing! --DanielRigal (talk) 15:48, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Further inappropriate attempt to communicate by email
I have made it clear that I will not communicate with you by email. For the record here is a verbatim copy of your message:

"'If it is not my business, it is none of your business to delete any content without the permission of wikipedia. Thank you.'"

I do not believe it to be coherent enough to respond to in any detail but I will just say that I will continue to remove any content which I see and which clearly violates Wikipedia polices. I am not targeting you. If you make any valid edits I will not remove those just because it is you who made them but any edit which promotes your book or yourself is invalid and will be removed in accordance with Wikipedia policies against spam.

You remain on final warning and any further spamming will almost certainly see you blocked from editing.

Sending me email will not change this. It only makes your behaviour seem even more unrepentant. Please do not send me any further email. If you have anything to say you can say it here or on my talk page, where it is visible to all Wikipedia users who can also participate. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)