User talk:Angelajhyb/sandbox

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Angelajhyb
 * article is in user's sandbox

Content evaluation
I really like that you added a section for modes of transmission. I feel like a lot of folks would have put this under pathogenicity but I think it's important that it has its own heading. The way your headings all have subheadings is great and helps the reader thoroughly understand your information as well as help with the flow of the article. I think it might be nice to list all the name changes the species went through in the history section. I noticed you put it in the box to the right but I think full sentences might also make your article more readable. It might also be beneficial to include links to other webpages within your article, especially for words like lobectomy, that you have listed pathogenicity. It might be nice to link it to another page so that when the user hovers over it they get a definition. It would make the article look a bit more polished versus having a quick definition in brackets! Do you think that maybe the Farming Soils and Crops setting might look better if it was replaced with "Habitat"? Then you could talk about the different habitats underneath! I think you did a great job with organization otherwise!

Tone and balance evaluation
You did a wonderful job keeping your work neutral and unbiased. It looks like it should form a good article.

Sources and references evaluation
Content is backed up with good solid sources. I wasn't able to contribute any more sources than what you already have, you really nailed it.

Overall evaluation
I learned a lot reading this and I think that once it is put into a complete article it will look great. The headings and subheadings are an excellent idea making it easy to find information quickly. I've listed some suggestions under content evaluation that may help! Category:Wikipedia Student Program

Category:Wikiedu.org course templates

Hdewett (talk) 13:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)