User talk:Angeles j

June 2015
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Pit bull, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 13:15, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Gull Dong
Angeles, I don't understand the redirect Gull Dong. Why does this redirect exist? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gull Dong


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Gull Dong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. dalahäst (let's talk!) 02:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tibetan Mastiff, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. dalahäst (let's talk!) 07:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Gull Dong listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gull Dong. Since you had some involvement with the Gull Dong redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop reinserting the picture of the dog that is not an Askal.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:40, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Angeles j, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure