User talk:Angelgreat/Archive 2

Speedy deletion nomination of Azamara Club Cruises


A tag has been placed on Azamara Club Cruises, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Additionally, it looks like you may have been violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. You'll need to address this, too, in your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 13:00, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

I am leaving Wikipedia for a while
Since I am blocked from editing Wikipedia, I will no longer be able to edit paged. Therefore, I am leaving Wikipedia for a while starting now in order to prevent a ban and a termination of my Wikipedia account. When I come back, I will no longer do any vandilism to any Wikipedia page, so if you want to talk to me, talk to my email account. Goodbye Wikipedia, I will be back... Angelgreat (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2018 (CST)

I want to be unblocked

 * So you're claiming that you have no conflict of interest in a certain company that your editing was focused around? Why it's so important to you, then? Max Semenik (talk) 21:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you calling me a liar? I didn't add any copyrighted material from another website ever since the Spintendo incident, The added material was already there on the page. I try to be honest and write In my own words, Also I didn't want to be blocked by the Admins, I just wanted The Azamara Club Cruises Page restored in Preparation for Azamara Pursuit. I tried to restore it, but to no avail. GIVE ME BACK MY EDITING RIGHTS OR GIVE ME MY ACCOUNT TERMINATION, I don't want any conflicts. Angelgreat (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2018 (CST)
 * You violated copyright on 2018-03-30 with your recreation of Azamara Club Cruises without crediting the previous contributors. Note that accounts cannot be deleted, if that's what you mean by "ACCOUNT TERMINATION". --Yamla (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The only reason I coundn't credit previous contributors because the History catalog of Azamara Club Cruises was deleted along with the main page, so I don't know who to credit. Also, why didn't I get a expiration time on my ban? Am I being forced to take a Indefinite wikibreak? I know I screwed up, and I regret it, but what else I can do while I wait to be released from the ban indefinitely? Angelgreat (talk) 21:00, 2 April 2018 (CST)
 * You claimed you didn't add any copyrighted material after the Spintendo incident. I showed you did. You then came up with an excuse that doesn't remotely explain your earlier falsehood or your copyright violation. I'm disinclined to believe anything else you are telling us. The block is indefinite. You need to convince an admin you understand your numerous violations of copyright, you need to convince an admin we can trust you not to violate copyright again, and you need to convince an admin you don't have a conflict of interest here, and can be trusted to refrain from any further WP:PROMO. This is a high bar to reach. All you've managed to do is convince me you will continue with your inappropriate edits if we ever unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 11:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Again, I still want to be unblocked (Shortened Version)
As of this edit, you have explicitly stated at the top of the page that if we don't unblock you and instead, revoke your access to this page, you will violate WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK by creating a new account. This proves you are acting in bad faith and cannot be trusted. As such, I have revoked talk page access. If you are caught continuing to edit, all of your edits may be thrown away (see WP:DENY). If you refrain from setting up any other accounts, and assuming your current unblock request is denied, you can apply under WP:SO in six months. You will need to use WP:UTRS at that time. In order to be unblocked then, you would need to convince the admin you understand copyright (so far, you've gone out of your way to explain you do not understand copyright), you would need to convince them you would refrain from any further promotional edits (and would likely need to agree to a topic ban around the cruise industry, broadly construed), and would need to explain what on earth possessed you to threaten to break WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK. If on the other hand, you are caught making any edits at all (on whatever account), you will not be eligible for unblock consideration. --Yamla (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Email access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Cross-wiki attacks
This user has engaged in cross-wiki attacks and harassment and will need to address that if they are ever considered for unblocking. --Yamla (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC) (though it's likely they'll end up globally locked and banned before then) --Yamla (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

User has engaged in block evasion as of July, 2018. --Yamla (talk) 11:40, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Continued block evasion
See User talk:174.97.130.168. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 00:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 21:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Block evasion in April, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 11:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 22:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

April 10, 2019
You announce at the top of this page(I get that it was earlier, but it's still there) that if you are not unblocked you will go and create a new account, which is sockpuppetry. How do we know that you have not done this? Why should we now believe that you are prepared to follow Wikipedia guidelines? What do you intend to edit about? You will also need to indicate that you understand WP:COPYVIO. 331dot (talk) 02:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I have not created a diffrent account since the ip address that I used, 174.97.130.168, was blocked because I used it while blocked. I only used it to remove the message on top of my talk page, but I got blocked from that IP address for block evasion. If you search up my ip, it's at Milwaukee, Wisconsin. That's where I live. Speaking of ip, User Yamla accused me of evading my block on April 9 because someone left a message about me on Yamla's talk page. The ip of the person who messaged Yamla is 49.180.52.165. That ip is at Port Macquarie, Australia. That can't be me because I have never been to Australia ever and that person left that message at 3:08 AM UTC. Since ip 49.180.52.165 is at Australia, the time that person would have published that would have been at 1:08 PM AEST. That time would have been 10:08 PM in Milwaukee, and I was at the Fandom website at the time, so it couldn't have been me. Yamla has made a mistake on identification. I didn't evade my block on Wikipedia April 9 since I was in Milwaukee at the time and was visiting the Fandom website. If you want proof, I have screenshots of my history. As for the rest of the questions, I do know what copyright is, it's the right to have someone's work published anywhere with person. If the copyright holder says Yes or no to using their work, you have to respect that. Also, it's been a year since I got blocked and I have read the rules of Wikipedia and reflected on my actions. I have also visited other websites and gone on with my life. I'm ready to come back as a changes user. I will follow rules.Angelgreat (talk) 03:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: I have altered the message on top of my talk page, so it no longer includes the offensive text. This should help me get unblocked. Angelgreat (talk) 23:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Evidence that I did not evade my block on Tuesday.
This does absolutely nothing to eliminate WP:MEAT. Why would someone completely unrelated to you, suddenly come by to talk about getting you unblocked? I mean, there are millions of blocked users and they just choose to discuss you? And about one day before you come back and request the same thing? No, you'll need to explain why this happened. Additionally, you haven't really addressed your copyright violations. In such cases, I often request people answer the following questions, taken from Yunshui. Please be careful! Copying and pasting your answers from elsewhere would itself be a violation of copyright!

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

--Yamla (talk) 10:15, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * What is copyright?
 * How is Wikipedia licenced?
 * Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
 * Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
 * How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

I like to talk to a different admin, mainly because of this post: Angelgreat (talk) 20:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Block evasion
This user has engaged in block evasion as of July, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 10:54, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

UTRS 38439
is now open. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 11:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Following that UTRS appeal, I have restored talk page access to allow an unblock request here. JBW (talk) 16:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

December 12, 2020

 * I wasn't accusing Yamla of disabling the request, I said that she might have. I assumbed it could have been accidental, not intentional. I'm sorry if my wording has affected your decision, I won't type anything similar to the accusation again to not affect future unblocking request. Angelgreat (talk) 15:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You said I suspect that Yamla could have intentionally disabled my request - I can't see another way to read that, other than as an assumption, or at the very least an inappropriately voiced suspicion, of bad faith. I am not disabling talk page access, so you are at liberty to make another request for someone else to review, but I'd ask that you do not remove or change any of these comments as they will be of relevance in considering any such review. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  15:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

It's been a month
Over a month has passed and no one has responded to my Block request. I suspect that Yamla could have intentionally disabled my request when she removed and then reinstated  it, but then again maybe the admins are busy on other things. I'll keep to get a response as I am a patient person, after all I'm not rushing anyone. Angelgreat (talk) 19:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

January 22, 2021

 * Socking on commons as of today, though I don't see any socking on EnWP. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * That wasn't me, that was https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:69_Porn who was since been blocked. If you check https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Sockpuppets_of_Miggy72, the vandal is listed there. The vandal also vandalized both my user page and my talk page, but another admin undid the vandalism on the latter. The vandalism on the former still remains. Angelgreat (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

April 12, 2021
I am unfamiliar with your story. Please tell me in detail what you did that got you blocked. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the late response, I was busy with other stuff in life. So around 2 and a half years ago, I recreated a page without crediting the original creators and I got blocked for that. After two a few unblocking requests, I threatened to ban evade and they revoked my talk page access in retaliation. I have changed a lot since then as I have matured. I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not cause any damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions to Wikipedia. I want another chance here to redeem myself here and I do want to be contributing here, but it seems the Admins refuse to do so for the things I did when I was younger. I know that not everyone is perfect, but I think another chance will prove it. I'll give you time to review my request and if you accept or decline, I'll understand your decision. Angelgreat (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank You for unblocking me. Angelgreat (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)