User talk:Angelika.schanda

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefan Blachfellner (August 2)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Stefan_Blachfellner Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Scope creep was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Unable to determine why is notable. No coverage. No references, papers are insufficient. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO and doesn't satisfy WP:PROF.

 scope_creep Talk  09:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Stefan Blachfellner concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stefan Blachfellner, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Stefan Blachfellner


The page Draft:Stefan Blachfellner has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. kingboyk (talk) 16:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello Angelika.schanda. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Angelika.schanda. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. kingboyk (talk) 16:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Reply to Kingboyk February 2020
Hi

I did not get paid when I constructed this page, as at the time that I submitted it I only meant to help out a colleague since I really appreciated his work, being a self employed trainer myself. However, later I have become an employee at the Bertalanffy Center, and wasn't aware of any arising conflict, my apologies if this is the impression now. Since the review by Wikipedia took several months and was declined in August, I had simply dropped the matter and forgot about it. So if you hadn't already deleted it, I would do so happily now.

I hope this resolves the matter as I certainly did not make any profit from this and would not in the future.

Thank you for your message and the clarifying links, I certainly learned more and will watch out more closely for such possible conflicts in the future.

Please let me know if this is alright and if there are any further steps that I should take.

Kind regards, Angelika S.