User talk:AngeloKonecki

February 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at When We Were Young (Adele song). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — I B  [ Poke ] 14:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at When We Were Young (Adele song), you may be blocked from editing. — I B  [ Poke ] 20:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at When We Were Young (Adele song). — I B  [ Poke ] 20:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at 25 (Adele album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — I B  [ Poke ] 20:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Mike V • Talk 20:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adele Live 2016, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 19:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Adele Live 2016. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Adele Live 2016, you may be blocked from editing. ''References added do not support figures given. Please stop introducing deliberately inaccurate figures.'' Egghead06 (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Do you like to be viewed as dumb or what? Check the dates and count them: http://www.webcitation.org/6gD2NHyha / http://www.billboard.com/biz/current-boxscore You'll see that the numbers are not wrong. Stop reverting an article with two reliable sources from Billboard. If they're inaccurate, why you're keeping the stats in the box, with 1,311,343 / 1,311,343 (100%) and $141,140,438? What's your fucking problem?

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Adele Live 2016. These figures you are adding do not appear in sources given. Egghead06 (talk) 13:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Adele Live 2016, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 21:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2018
I have continued to revert your edits on James Charles (model) as they lack proper citations and explanations. Please refrain from making edits like these again, or you may be reported. Thank you. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 20:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 19:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dean Phoenix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Dean_Phoenix check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Dean_Phoenix?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at All I Ask (Adele song). Dl2000 (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. <b style="border:1px solid #dfdfdf;color:green; padding:1px 3px;background:#FFD">Ron h jones </b>(Talk) 21:53, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Carson. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Booboo Stewart, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sofia Carson; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dove Cameron. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)