User talk:AngieLawRCMusic

Welcome
Hello AngieLawRCMusic. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AngieLawRCMusic. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -- VViking Talk Edits 22:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi there,
 * I am an employee at the Royal Conservatory and have updated my profile since. Thanks! AngieLawRCMusic (talk) 18:20, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JBW (talk) 22:51, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Since receiving the messages above, you have ontinued to edit contrary to the conflict of interest guideline, and you have again added to an article commentary expressing a point of view, namely a point of view promoting the institution for which you are working. Thank you for posting a declaration of your status as a paid editor, but that alone is not enough; you should comply with all aspects of the conflict of interest guideline. Please read that guideline carefully, and make sure you do comply with it. If you don't, then you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator. JBW (talk) 10:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)