User talk:Angie Balzan

hey

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elena Degenhardt (October 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elena Degenhardt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elena Degenhardt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Elena_Degenhardt Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Elena_Degenhardt reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:55, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Angie Balzan, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm happy to see you have already started creating articles about women from Malta with Loranne Vella. I hope there will be many more. You might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. In connection with Draft:Elena Degenhardt, it would be useful if you could identify at least one museum or gallery in which her work forms part of the permanent connection. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your positive comments. I am working to insert more data on Loranne Vella's page. I look forward to more edits and page creations. Its a bit tough in the beginning because I am still learning the ropes but I hope to be well conversant soon. Thanks again. Angie Balzan (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)


 * If you want to gain more general experience in editing, you should try The Wikipedia Adventure.--Ipigott (talk) 12:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Angie Balzan, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Draft:Anna Grima have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Grima (March 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anna Grima and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anna Grima, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Anna_Grima Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Anna_Grima reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 20:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Elena Degenhardt concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Elena Degenhardt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Luciano Micallef
Hello Angie Balzan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Luciano Micallef for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 18:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi I do not think this page should be tagged for deletion. Luciano Micallef is considered one of the most influential abstract painters of the 20th century in Malta. His career has seen him contribute to the local scene on many fronts. He was commissioned by the government of Malta to design national stamps on various occasions. Books by leading Maltese philosophers have been written about him and his work. He has been recognized by various leading entities and been given various prestigious titles and prizes in recognition of his work. I think i should be given some more time to add further data and their relevant citations before this page is deleted. Thank you Angie Balzan (talk) 00:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Luciano Micallef


A tag has been placed on Luciano Micallef, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 20:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Inspirasia Foundation


A tag has been placed on Inspirasia Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 20:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

hi. it has been pointed out to me that I have used language that is considered superfluous or promotional in my writing for Inspirasia page. I did not intend it to sound this way. I have read through the wiki guidelines with regards to writing about organisations and would like to give this page another try. Is there any way Zi can retrieve the deleted page to rework it and clean up content ? thank you for your guidance. i’m still learning the ropes here. Angie Balzan (talk) 22:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Inspirasia Foundation, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

hi. why would you think this is promotional? This is a charity. They do philanthropic work in many countries. Please advise where you think i went wrong. Angie Balzan (talk) 21:50, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Charities can be promoted. Wikipedia articles must be written in a strictly neutral fashion in both tone and content, never "talking up" anything. In this case: Working hand in hand with local organisations in various countries around the World, Inspirasia gives them the tools to change lives, create impact and inspire others to follow their example. (pure saccharine marketese), Since then, it has grown into a leading ("leading" according to what reliable source? That's a peacock term), The island is Inspirasia Foundation’s home and heart of activity. (completely inappropriate tone, "the organization is based in" would suffice, provided a reliable source confirms it), Using the knowledge and skills of local experts, the ‘more than money’ support is built on targeting the specific needs of the community and empowering leaders to help make the change (pure brochure junk). The rest continues on that way. Wikipedia articles must stick to facts verified by reliable and independent sources, and never use flowery language or any kind of "talking up". That includes for nonprofits. Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. You are right. When pointed out in this way they really seem like excessive bla bla. I’m feeling guilty that my lack of tact and proper usage has resulted in info about a worthwhile cause going down the drain. Is there any way I can retrieve the page and rewrite it ? Angie Balzan (talk) 22:09, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

I’m a wiki newbie. I’m still learning the ropes. I really believe in this platform and would never try to disrupt or harm in any way Angie Balzan (talk) 22:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * That's as may be, but then what I would tell you is to listen to what other editors are telling you. You tried to create an article at AfC, and it got declined. That should not have been a signal to you that you were ready to create an article in mainspace; it should've told you the exact opposite. Yet you then went on to create Luciano Micallef which was deleted as promotion. Now, certainly, that should have told you that you were not ready yet to create mainspace articles, but then you created another promotional mainspace article. Newer editors should, preferably, gain a lot of experience editing existing articles before attempting to create any new ones. If you really think you're ready, use draft and AfC again to be sure, rather than trying straight into mainspace again. It is hard to get a mainspace article right on the first try; doing a draft leaves space for corrections. Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

For an experienced editor such as yourself things look perfectly clear. When a new person enters the scene, then it is trials and tribulations coupled with garnering of knowledge that helps their progress. I will take your words of advice and rewrite the pages in Draft. I will also be more careful with my choice of words. It is very easy to fall into the trap of using superfluous language when your job is writing for commercial institutions. Thank you for your guidance. I hope it makes a better editor out of me. Angie Balzan (talk) 22:59, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

is it possible for you to userfy the article in my mainspace or do you suggest i start from scratch ? Either way i’m going to start it as a draft. It would be great if i could clean up and reuse the content. Would i be imposing if i asked you to take a look at it in draft after it’s ready ? thanks again Angie Balzan (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I actually was willing to do that, but as part of any restoration I have to check for copyright violations. I found that several parts of the article were copied directly from . Direct copying without quotation and attribution is a copyright violation, and please remember to write any future article content in your own words rather than copying and pasting. (Brief direct quote are acceptable if they are used very sparingly and properly attributed). Since the article contains copyright violations, I cannot restore it. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

I understand. I could not clearly work out the exact function of that organization and in my efforts to be as precise as possible I opted to use their descriptions. I did not want to attribute anything that was not theirs or the opposite. This is the only one time in the whole article where text has been lifted. i should have put it in quotes. Angie Balzan (talk) 00:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I understand it is a mistake rather than an act of malice, but it's still the same. It would be literally illegal for me to knowingly restore a copyright violation, and I am not willing to take that risk. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

is it possible to omit that part and retrieve the rest ? I understand if you say thus is not possible. Thank you once again for your patience in explaining why these actions are being taken. It helps me to understand the whole dynamic. To be honest I’m thinking maybe I do not have what it takes to contribute. I really believed I could do good. Angie Balzan (talk) 00:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't give up quite so easily. I don't see a way I could easily take out the copyright violations from the history, and in any case that's more than I'm generally willing to do. I could, however, copy the URLs to all the references you used in the article for you to have another go of it to a userspace subpage. If you'd like me to do that, let me know. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes pls. At least I have something to start working on. I guess just like everything else the beginning is always the hardest. It is people like you who encourage people like me to continue trying. thank you for that. I’ll leave you in peace now. Angie Balzan (talk) 01:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * This list is at User:Angie Balzan/sandbox/reflist. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

thank you. Angie Balzan (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Elena Degenhardt


Hello, Angie Balzan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elena Degenhardt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  Squeeps10 Talk to meMy edits 19:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Luciano Micallef


A tag has been placed on Luciano Micallef, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Praxidicae (talk) 14:39, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikivoyage
Hi Angie. Thanks for asking about Wikivoyage. I suggest you start with small edits while you get familiar with the Wikivoyage format. Then you build up to more ambitious edits if you wish. Check the info in Malta articles and you might find outdated info about attractions, restaurants, bars etc. If you correct and update that info, that will be valuable work that will help you get to know Wikivoyage. Check the Wikivoyage:Quick contribution guide, Wikivoyage:Help and Wikivoyage:Manual of style. Nurg (talk) 10:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC) Thank you for the tips. I'm planning to start working on the articles this week. I will definitely keep your points in mind.Angie Balzan (talk) 10:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Birkirkara, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Enivid (talk) 09:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Hi. Thank you for the info. I was in the process of inserting the data when I realised that the citations were not correct. I am in the process of verifying some data through the said citations as well as compiling new citations to verify what I have stated. I should be able to post all within the coming days. Angie Balzan (talk) 08:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October 2020
Your edit to Balzan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Alex Attard moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Alex Attard, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. nearlyevil 665  09:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Attard


A tag has been placed on Alex Attard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Alex Attard moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Alex Attard, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. YODADICAE👽 14:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC) I will work on the article over the coming days to ensure it meets wiki citation requirements. --Angie Balzan (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Calleja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page De La Salle College. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alex Attard
Hello, Angie Balzan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alex Attard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Weingard (November 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Weingard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Weingard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mark_Weingard Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slywriter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mark_Weingard reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 01:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women In Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging