User talk:Angkorangel

August 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maitreya, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. SudoGhost 22:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Maitreya. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SudoGhost 09:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Maitreya, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SudoGhost 02:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Stop.
Look, it doesn't matter how many times you add this individual to the Maitreya article, it will always be removed. Every time it's been added, it is either unsourced or sourced to the individual's own website, which doesn't satisfy the question of this being a notable claim. If this were a notable claim, it would need a third-party reliable source showing that this is a relevant individual in terms of the article. The lack of such a source indicates that this is not a notable individual in terms of relevance to the Maitreya article. If you continue to add the content to the article, you will be reported for edit warring and very likely blocked from editing.

If you feel this individual needs a mention on the article, you're more than welcome to start a discussion on the article's talk page and provide any third-party sources that would back up that assertion. However, simply re-adding the content to the article will not achieve the results you're looking for; the article is on the watchlists of several editors, and we can see whenever the article is changed, and the content will simply be removed upon discovery because what is being added to the article does not appear to belong in the article. Again, if you disagree you're more than welcome to discuss it on the talk page, but please do not attempt to reinsert it into the article. Thank you. - SudoGhost 06:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - SudoGhost 06:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using your account only to promote a living person. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 12:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Angkorangel for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. SudoGhost 05:13, 27 September 2012 (UTC)