User talk:Angkorgo2

John Howard (and flags)
Please review the comments on the talk page of the John Howard article before restoring flags to the infobox thanks. -- Longhair\talk 05:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * On a similar topic, you might also want to take a read over Manual of Style (flags) to learn more about the usage of flags in articles in general. -- Longhair\talk 05:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Yep, same issue with Michael Spence. AdamSmithee 07:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Re:Canadian Passport (and other passports) - Place of birth does vary
You may have misunderstood, it is very normal for passports to contain the place of birth, for example, My German passport contains my place of birth even though I was born in the UK. It is the norm in most countries. And the removal of it from a passport is irrelevent, sorry. Please also attach references. -- Île_flottante~Floating island   Talk  17:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Glad to be of service! Indeed, you're not alone in being unaware of the inconsistencies regarding how places of birth are listed and passports; this is part of the reason why it's an issue which many people don't know about - and want to know about. (This also explains why it's such an important issue and one worth duly highlighting.) (Also note that the references are already on the page which someone else kindly attached (in the form of the sample images distributed by respective governments).)

Update per November, 2009: I trust you have been aware of the major issues which place of birth has for those who emigrate from their home countries. Also, as you may have heard, countries routinely list places of birth inconsistently - and variably. Indeed, there is no "standard" which exists - and many people are discriminated against because of these varying standards. Canada allows one to petition to have one's place of birth (which lists a country) removed; other countries don't list one's country of birth at all to avoid this issue. It is, indeed, a big one!

Fair use rationale for File:Gamelanmap.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gamelanmap.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  06:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the update and a due fair use rationale was added on 7 October 2010!

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:BruceNickerson.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Calliopejen1 were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Angkorgo2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Angkorgo2/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Angkorgo2/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Calliopejen1&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Angkorgo2/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Angkorgo2/sandbox


Hello, Angkorgo2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! 5a5ha seven (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carlos Scott Lopez-Gelormino


The article Carlos Scott Lopez-Gelormino has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Melcous (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)