User talk:Angunnu

Angunnu, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Thank you... Angunnu (talk) 07:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Angunnu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 06:52, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Angunnu (talk) 02:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Citing sources
Hello again. In reviewing your edits, including those at Thrombin and Protein S, I see that you are not adding sources for your contributions. Anything that is not common knowledge (like "the sky is blue") should be cited to a reliable source (like a newspaper or journal article or a book), which is also described in the links in the welcome message above. The source should preferably, but not necessarily, be online-accessible. Please have a look. Cheers! —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 10:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * BTW, if you want to go back and add the sources to your contributions, you can see your history at Special:Contributions/Angunnu. —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]—


 * Try this:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources


 * I favour the inline citation style, using  tags. But there's several ways of citing. MrDemeanour (talk) 12:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the help. I think it will take some time for me to get adapted to the methods here .Well will keep trying. Angunnu (talk) 12:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Don't worry; if you screw it up, eventually someone will come along and repair it. The main (only?) asset of Wikipedia is its legion of editors, and you are one of them.


 * And to be sure, it takes time to learn how to do things like citing - I've been editing since about 2004, and I have much to learn. There are tools you can use to make citations easier, but I haven't learned to use them! MrDemeanour (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi. You seem to have gotten the hang of it at Protein S, presumably looking at the coding of the other refs in the article, which is always a great way to learn here. Good job! One thing you may not have run across is the re-use of cites. If you need to use a cite more than once in the same article, in the leading  tag, you can add a name, like  . Later, if you want to use that ref again, just use   (note the extra  ) instead of repeating the whole reference. Cheers! —[  Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 19:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi.Yes,kind of. Now,if I am adding PMID1234...does it have to be any particular number,or will any random number be enough? Angunnu (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You can call it whatever you like, within reason. To be safe, stick to letters, numbers, hyphens, and underscores and surround it with "quotes". I usually use an abbreviation of the source name/author+hyphen+date, e.g.,  —[  Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 09:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Okay.Got it.

Names
Hi. In edits like this one to Factor VIII, when you introduce a new name to the article, like Tuddenham, it's best to include their given name as well. You should also try to find that person's wikipedia article if it exists to provide the reader with a convenient link to read more about them. Subsequent mentions by surname are fine. In this case, I changed  to , producing Edward Tuddenham (after verifying that link was to the correct person). There may sometimes be other words, too, that could benefit from linking, though see WP:OVERLINK. Cheers, and keep up the good work! —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 23:40, 29 October 2019 (UTC) Got it!

Hi,when we are using names which appear in red color on the Wikipedia page should we link them- like when a page is not yet created but still it is appearing in red letters. If yes please tell me how to do that too. Thank you. Angunnu (talk) 15:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * linking to a page that does not exist is saying that you think the page should and eventually will exist, it is inviting other editors to create the page. If the person nor topic you are linking to seems to be clearly notable is is relavant to the article you are editing, feel free. See WP:REDLINK. However, if in doublt, it is better to avoid a redlink -- make one only when it seems rather clear cut. Make a redlink by enclosing the name of the topic in double square brackets, like this:, which renders as: New topic. I hope that is clear. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 03:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I noticed your post on the talk page at MAN, and have looked up a little of the controversy about the picture on the internet. After reading some commentary, not being Indian, I have no understanding. Could you explain why the picture is controversial? Thanks! Jacona (talk) 13:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jacona],Regarding the photo on[[MAN, I wouldn’t say that the picture is controversial..The discussions are more likely due to the fact the guy in the picture looks like a person from Kerala,which is a state in India.The local media and FM channels are discussing it as to find out who the guy is.That’s all.It was amusing for all of us here that Wikipedia selected a local guy for its page on MAN(Angunnu (talk) 04:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC))

Better source
Have found a better source. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 12:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Un encyclopaedic
What is expected to do with “unencyclopedic” article (Angunnu (talk) 13:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC))

Speedy deletion nomination of Whole blood clotting test (WBCT)
Hello Angunnu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Whole blood clotting test (WBCT) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Angunnu, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Ciraparantag have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vishwak Sen


A tag has been placed on Vishwak Sen, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Raaj Tilak (talk) 08:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)