User talk:Angus135

April 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Velcro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:00, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Velcro was changed by Angus135 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856049 on 2015-04-16T07:00:55+00:00.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Valley of the Kings. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dylan Kitchener


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dylan Kitchener, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  05:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dung beetle, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Those sources you cited say nothing whatsoever about the content you are trying to add. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, let me be more blunt - those additions look like deliberate nonsense to me, and you risk a block if you do it again. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You did it again, so...

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CGP Grey ‎, you may be blocked from editing. — crh 23   &thinsp;(Talk) 11:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)