User talk:Anigr2/sandbox

Peer Review (Klong5)
The language used in your first edit does lead on the reader to feel sympathy for the prisoners, which could sway the readers opinion on the Death Penalty. My advice would be to try to keep it a little bit more neutral. Citations seem to be properly in place and formatted. The edit does seem substantial, but you should add more to it. You only have one edit complete, so I would focus more time on the other two. The topic is clear, but the wording can be improved greatly. I would recommend reviewing and editing everything you have done.

Peer Review: Matt
1.) None of the proposed article edits are biased in any way because they are just additions in information.

2.) The citations are in correct format and include the correct websites and the document associated with them.

3.)The edits are substantial because they add more detail to the botched execution section.

4.)Everything is worded well because it is a thought out response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdero3 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

User Response
With regards to the opinion that my first edit would make readers feel sympathy for the prisoners on death row, this is actually not my intent. I will be adding this section on botched execution to the Debate section of the main article. I am using examples of botched executions to further illustrate why there is such a great debate against the use of capital punishment. I agree that I need to add more edits, which I will be working on in the following days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anigr2 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 2 May 2018 (UTC)