User talk:Animall

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cardio First Angel (January 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Animall/Cardio First Angel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Animall Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Animall reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, you had posted at Roger Dodger's page, and this person asked me to comment because I am from WikiProject Medicine. The major problem with the article is that it does not cite any source which is independent of the stakeholders of the success of the product. Currently, the sources mentioned in the article are the product's own marketing page and the manufacturer themselves. For this article to go live, identify 2-3 sources which were not published by people who have a financial stake in the product's success. Take information from those, cite the sources, then re-submit.
 * When making any health claim, it is expected that sources cited will comply with the guideline at Identifying reliable sources (medicine). I hope you understand that the guidelines are in place to maintain quality here. Let me know if you need assistance on-wiki.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  11:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
 Blue Rasberry  (talk)  14:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your initial article
Hiya @Animall: Thank you for the invite to take a look at your initial start-to-finish article which was - as you see above - not accepted and several people explaining carefully why. In the time I've been around the project, I've seen dozens of new contributors start just as you did - write about something close and personal - get shot down and then turn around and realize that the gift of Wikipedia is not writing about one's own self, but about the great and interesting world around us.

For example, if you google my name, you'll find I have quite a few publications - mostly in herpetology. How many articles about frogs, toads, lizards, snakes, caecilians or crocodiles have I edited .... Zero. I consider it a conflict to edit within the sphere in which I'm one of the published authorities and I'm leaving it to people who don't have a pile of titles on the shelf to contribute to wiki because it is through their winnowing and learning that knowledge comes flowing out.

Please take some time and observe other articles. One of the best places, IMHO to observe WikiQuality at work is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Current_nominations where you can read all sorts of interesting new articles and see experienced editor comments on what works and what doesn't work. After at least a week of really looking at that process, go back and take a look at your suggestion - and I think you'll see everything a lot clearer. Again, please don't hesitate to leave me messages, but try to do it here or on my talk page?? I'm an admin at Commons, but not here and can't do more than offer advice... which is read a lot first... look at all those funny little numbers after practically every sentence and how they lead to reliable secondary sources... observe the neutral point of view in articles, no fanboi and no cheerleaders here... and then see that each article is edited and reedited to the point where there's no "mine" anymore, merely "the articles." Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome
Thank you Ellin,

I appreciate your posting of these links

Cheers

Animall

Your draft article, User:Animall/Cardio First Angel


Hello, Animall. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Cardio First Angel".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Cardio First Angel concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cardio First Angel, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cardio First Angel


Hello, Animall. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Cardio First Angel".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

The comment they left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Animall/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Animall/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Animall/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Onel 5969  TT me 12:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Re: Cardio First Angel
My comment at User talk:Onel5969 was in a different thread and not a reply to your comment. That's why I had a header noting it was a different topic. Sorry if that caused confusion. —C.Fred (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cardio First Angel


Hello, Animall. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Cardio First Angel".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 04:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)