User talk:Anime Addict AA

Welcome

 * That was... fast, thanks. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Futaba Channel
Hi there. You were a participant in the discussion for this article, which I closed as delete. I restored and relisted the article at AfD yesterday. I notified most participants, but somehow missed you and a couple of others. Please accept my apologies. The discussion is here. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  04:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, much appreciated. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 12:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Network television schedules
Hi Anime,

Your input at Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not would be greatly appreciated. Firsfron of Ronchester 14:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Anime r
Template:Anime r has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 14:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Porn industry output
Since you requested a source: With pot and porn outstripping corn, America's black economy is flying high, The Guardian. Average porn feature production in the US: 11,000 titles per year, over 200 per week. That's exclusively feature production in the US, hence the comparison to feature prodcution in other categories. If you want to include TV in the comparison, you would need to expand the quantity of porn to include print media, online presence and interactive material (mostly Japanese H-games). Remember that Wikipedia probably wouldn't exist were it not for the porn industry. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 21:20, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Who said anything about banning it? You were the one who wanted to extend the comparison beyond a strict like-for-like basis.  I put forward an equivalent comparison - adult features vs. other features.  81.111.114.131 (talk) 01:56, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tele7abc.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Tele7abc.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)